SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.2118/173319-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimetic Finite Differences for Flow in Fractures from Microseismic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider a parametric description of Γ h and indicate with s the arc-length coordinate. We assume to have numbered the fracture edges so that s i is the center ofê i , with s 1 < s 2 …”
Section: Finite Volume Discretization Of the Fracture Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a parametric description of Γ h and indicate with s the arc-length coordinate. We assume to have numbered the fracture edges so that s i is the center ofê i , with s 1 < s 2 …”
Section: Finite Volume Discretization Of the Fracture Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the use of MFD has grown considerably, thanks to their flexibility and ability to preserve important properties of the physical and mathematical model. MDF has been employed to simulate flow in networks of fractures, see [12,13], and flows in fractured porous media [3,10], with a primal and mixed formulation, respectively. It has been used also for quasilinear elliptic problems [8], as well as non-linear and control problems [5][6][7].The present work can be considered in continuity with the strategy used in [10], but differs from the previous literature because a dual mixed formulation, discretized with the MFD method, is employed in the bulk medium as well as in the fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the others, in Pichot et al (), the mortar method is used in order to allow for a partial nonconformity of the mesh at fracture intersections. Other strategies involve the use of nonstandard finite element techniques in order to ease the meshing process: the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) has been used in Huang et al (), D'Angelo and Scotti (), Berrone et al (), Formaggia et al (), and Schwenck et al () allowing for meshes that can cross the interfaces; Mimetic Finite Differences (MFD) were used in Huang et al () and Al‐Hinai et al (); the Virtual Element Method (VEM) was applied in Benedetto et al (), allowing for polygonal meshes. A new code for the simulation of flows in fracture networks, also taking into account randomness of input parameters is described in Hyman et al (), Makedonska et al (), and Hyman et al ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%