2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.03.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimicking electrostatic interactions with a set of effective charges: a genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 The partial charge on every atom can also be obtained reliably, in the sense of reproducing the electric field around the molecule with a controlled error threshold, with various methods. 6,7 These QC investigations of a single molecule, which have been for decades the frontier and the test ground for generations of methodological approaches to solving the Schrödinger equation, have now become nearly standard and available to the average bench chemist, thanks to packages like Gaussian, 8 GAMESS, 9 ADF, 10 etc. For instance, the reliability of a number of DFT methods has recently been critically evaluated in terms of reproducibility, giving a comforting outlook, at least for modern codes and pseudopotentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 The partial charge on every atom can also be obtained reliably, in the sense of reproducing the electric field around the molecule with a controlled error threshold, with various methods. 6,7 These QC investigations of a single molecule, which have been for decades the frontier and the test ground for generations of methodological approaches to solving the Schrödinger equation, have now become nearly standard and available to the average bench chemist, thanks to packages like Gaussian, 8 GAMESS, 9 ADF, 10 etc. For instance, the reliability of a number of DFT methods has recently been critically evaluated in terms of reproducibility, giving a comforting outlook, at least for modern codes and pseudopotentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation has been partially alleviated by the recent development of larger and faster computers, better parallel algorithms, 27 and more accurate force fields designed specifically for liquid crystals. [28][29][30][31][32][33] As a result, there have been a number of notable atomistic simulations of liquid crystals. 26,29,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] Among these, only two have been performed on liquid crystal mixtures; one by Lansac et al on smectic mixtures of p,p -diheptylazobenzene (7AB) and 4-octyl-4 -cyanobiphenyl (8CB) molecules, 41 and the other by Pelaez and Wilson on a nematic mixture of E7, 42 which contains four components: 4-cyano-4 -n-pentyl-biphenyl (5CB), 4-cyano-4 -n-heptyl-biphenyl (7CB), 4-cyano-4 -n-octyloxy-biphenyl (80CB), and 4-cyano-4 -n-pentyl-p-terphenyl (5CT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be extremely computationally intensive within an atomistic model of a liquid crystal fluid, if each individual atom was assigned a multipole. Recently, Berardi and co-workers have provided a new algorithm for deriving a set of effective charges to improve the modelling of electrostatic interactions in liquid crystals using only a limited number of interaction sites thereby greatly reducing the computational cost required to include electrostatic terms [77].…”
Section: Progress In Atomistic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%