Motivated by the relationship between the folding mechanism and the native structure, we develop a unified approach for predicting folding pathways and tertiary structure using only the primary sequence as input. Simulations begin from a realistic unfolded state devoid of secondary structure and use a chain representation lacking explicit side chains, rendering the simulations many orders of magnitude faster than molecular dynamics simulations. The multiple round nature of the algorithm mimics the authentic folding process and tests the effectiveness of sequential stabilization (SS) as a search strategy wherein 2°structural elements add onto existing structures in a process of progressive learning and stabilization of structure found in prior rounds of folding. Because no a priori knowledge is used, we can identify kinetically significant nonnative interactions and intermediates, sometimes generated by only two mutations, while the evolution of contact matrices is often consistent with experiments. Moreover, structure prediction improves substantially by incorporating information from prior rounds. The success of our simple, homology-free approach affirms the validity of our description of the primary determinants of folding pathways and structure, and the effectiveness of SS as a search strategy.TerItFix | foldons | kinetic traps | Monte Carlo simulation D espite numerous advances since the original sequenceto-structure folding paradigm was proposed over 50 years ago (1), we still lack a general framework that enables simultaneous prediction of the folding mechanism and structure using only the amino acid (aa) sequence [notwithstanding recent successes of all-atom simulations to fold small, fast-folding proteins (2)]. An obvious obstacle is the astronomical number of conformations available to a polypeptide. Proteins overcome this obstacle by sampling a limited set of conformations, guided by the folding process itself. However, most successful structure prediction methods do not consider the folding mechanism when sampling conformations. Conversely, many methods for predicting folding mechanism rely on knowledge of the final structure (e.g., Gō models).Another obstacle emerges because many non-native and nearnative conformations often differ by only a few RT, which is at or beyond the ability of current energy functions to reliably distinguish. A related difficulty arises because the native state is the global free energy minimum even if three competing propertieslocal backbone torsional angle preferences, hydrogen bonded 2°structure, and 3°packing-are not individually optimized. For example, 3°context can overcome local biases in determining the final 2°structure (3). Hence, a successful framework should couple 3°context to 2°structure formation, rather than relying on a strict hierarchical approach.