2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12304-018-9339-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimicry, Camouflage and Perceptual Exploitation: the Evolution of Deception in Nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, mimicry biases the characteristics of a mimic to correspond with information that is emitted by a model. In wrongly identifying the mimic as the model, the target receiver (the dupe) releases a benefit for the mimic while paying some form of cost for being misled (Figure 1; Dalziell and Welbergen, 2016;Font, 2019). Mimetic traits persist where there is a net fitness benefit for receivers, since correct detection of a true signal from the model is nevertheless advantageous (Stevens, 2013;Font, 2019).…”
Section: Is Hawk-like Resemblance Adaptive For Cuckoos?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, mimicry biases the characteristics of a mimic to correspond with information that is emitted by a model. In wrongly identifying the mimic as the model, the target receiver (the dupe) releases a benefit for the mimic while paying some form of cost for being misled (Figure 1; Dalziell and Welbergen, 2016;Font, 2019). Mimetic traits persist where there is a net fitness benefit for receivers, since correct detection of a true signal from the model is nevertheless advantageous (Stevens, 2013;Font, 2019).…”
Section: Is Hawk-like Resemblance Adaptive For Cuckoos?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wrongly identifying the mimic as the model, the target receiver (the dupe) releases a benefit for the mimic while paying some form of cost for being misled (Figure 1; Dalziell and Welbergen, 2016;Font, 2019). Mimetic traits persist where there is a net fitness benefit for receivers, since correct detection of a true signal from the model is nevertheless advantageous (Stevens, 2013;Font, 2019). While examples of both signal and cue mimicry have been identified, the basis for their origin and maintenance are frequently debated and revised (Stevens, 2013;Dalziell and Welbergen, 2016;Jamie, 2017;Ruxton et al, 2018;de Jager and Anderson, 2019;Font, 2019).…”
Section: Is Hawk-like Resemblance Adaptive For Cuckoos?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, this distinction seems of little practical use in an evolutionary context. The terms "unintended" and "intended" do not make much sense in evolutionary biology and can be misleading (Font, 2018).…”
Section: Defining Signals and Cues In An Evolutionary Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the mimic is not misidentified by the predator but triggers the predator's pre-adapted response to a model, which benefits the mimic. This situation can lead to a coevolutionary arms race known as ‘sensory trap' [26,46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1‘Mimicry is resemblance/similarity in appearance and/or behaviour between a mimic and a model that provides a selective advantage to the mimic because it affects the behaviour of a receiver causing it to misidentify the mimic and that evolved (or is maintained by selection) because of those effects’ [26]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%