Mind–Body Treatments for Anxiety Disorders

Maiello, Marco; Ward, Meredith J.; Bui, Éric

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30687-8_14

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From a programmatic and intervention standpoint, the main findings of our review indicate that MBIs are effective for improving mental health and cognition (Domingues, 2018;Dunning et al, 2019;Maiello et al, 2020). Moreover, this SMSR has highlighted the effectiveness of using targeted MBIs to improve these domains among individuals with ACEs histories (Baer et al, 2019;Ortiz & Sibinga, 2017;Sheffler et al, 2020).…”

Section: Implications For Practitionersmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…There is a well-established evidence base supporting the use of standardized MBIs in treating mood and anxiety disorders (Lynch et al, 2003;Maiello et al, 2020;Segal & Teasdale, 2018), and borderline personality disorders (O'connell & Dowling, 2014). So much so that the National Institute for Care Excellence endorses MBCT as an effective treatment for preventing relapse in clinical depression (Crane & Kuyken, 2013).…”

Section: Efficacy Of Mbismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Efficacy of Targeted Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Improving Mental Health and Cognition Among Youth and Adults with ACE Histories: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review

Moyes

Nutman

Mirman

2022

Journ Child Adol Trauma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are associated with increased psychological wellbeing. The literature suggests that individuals exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may benefit greatly from MBIs. However, research has tended to focus on universal MBIs for this population with less attention on the effectiveness of targeted approaches. Moreover, there is growing concern regarding the methodological rigor of MBI research. This systematic mixed studies review (SMRS) reports the effectiveness of MBIs for improving mental health and cognition among individuals with ACE histories. Additionally, the review reports the quality and rigor of the included research. Systematic searches of PsycInfo, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, ProQuest Social Science database and the Child Development and Adolescent Studies database were conducted. Results were screened and data were extracted then synthesized using a data-based convergent synthesis design. Thirteen studies were included in the final review. Six prominent themes emerged. Themes indicated that MBIs were effective for improving mental health and cognition for individuals with ACEs. For example, improvements in mood and anxieties, as well as a better ability to manage emotions. Shortcomings in the quality of MBI research included lack of reporting of methodological details (e.g., randomization procedures) and not systematically reporting adverse event evaluations. Recommendations are made for future research to strengthen the evidence base for MBIs for individuals with ACEs.

show abstract