2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Mind the Gap’ between ecosystem services classification and strategic decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Potentially highly promising avenues for underpinning resource allocation decisions are based on detailed place-based analyses of supply and demand of ES (e.g., Kopperoinen et al, 2014; Vauhkonen and Ruotsalainen, 2017). On the other hand, broad, unspecified ES may be more easily adopted by policy actors, according to Van Oudenhoven et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially highly promising avenues for underpinning resource allocation decisions are based on detailed place-based analyses of supply and demand of ES (e.g., Kopperoinen et al, 2014; Vauhkonen and Ruotsalainen, 2017). On the other hand, broad, unspecified ES may be more easily adopted by policy actors, according to Van Oudenhoven et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, the outcomes obtained from UES studies are linked to the human well-being and its close relationship with nature [46,47]. From a global point of view, researchers must contribute to the efforts of United Nations (UN) to promote the development of sustainable cities and communities (Sustainable Development Goal, SDG 11) until 2030 [48][49][50][51][52]. Thus, RS data/techniques turns the findings of ES studies more relevant [53], more adequate to urban planning, and able to guide for sustainable development in these areas [13,[54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often the requirements from the economic, social, and ecosystem perspectives are interlinked. The concept of 'The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity' (TEEB) [71] can be useful in understanding the links between ecosystems and societal needs as well as in quantifying the value of ecosystems tor human beings in the decision-making process [20]. TEEB could potentially aid in demonstrating the economic added value of an ecosystem-based approach to seaport design (e.g., in terms of generated services or prevented loss of existing services), and so support the integration of such economic consequences into the planning and design processes.…”
Section: Extending and Improving The Knowledge Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, negative ecosystem impacts could backfire on the port itself, for example by port-induced coastal erosion and sedimentation [18]. Moreover, an ecosystem-based approach can generate added value in terms of ecosystem services such as flood protection, food production, and recreation [4,6,19,20]. To take such larger-scale effects into account from the onset, several authors have stressed the need for project-superseding Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA) to incorporate ecosystem values at the higher, strategic levels of decision-making, such as in policies, plans, and programs [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%