2017
DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2017.1308944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the Gap: Inconsistencies Between Subjective and Objective Financial Risk Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Objective as well as subjective measures of risk tolerance are needed to accurately assess financial risk tolerance (Marinelli et al, 2017). The presented scale can be combined with clients' objective data such as investors' real-life portfolios to further prove its criterion validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Objective as well as subjective measures of risk tolerance are needed to accurately assess financial risk tolerance (Marinelli et al, 2017). The presented scale can be combined with clients' objective data such as investors' real-life portfolios to further prove its criterion validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring risk tolerance is challenging as it is a psychological characteristic and as such not directly observable (Yao & Curl, 2011). Combining subjective data obtained from developed scales and objective risk measures based on previous behavior shall result in the most accurate assessment of clients' risk tolerance (Marinelli, Mazzoli, & Palmucci, 2017). However, gathering objective data is not always possible due to lack of data and privacy protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that risk tolerance remains fairly stable throughout one's life (Sahm, 2007;Van de Venter et al, 2012). Moreover, various constructs, including education, experience, literacy, and emotion, affect how an individual responds to particular risk tolerance measures (Finke & Guillemette, 2016;Grable et al, 2009;Loewenstein et al, 2001;Marinelli et al, 2017;Roszkowski & Grable, 2005). This literature review summarizes the prevailing concerns about risk tolerance measures and motivates this investigation's theory choice and mixed-method approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk is typically studied using quantitative means, although research has documented that qualitative factors play an important role (Marinelli et al, 2017). To address this gap in the current research, this study used FTT and mixed methods (i.e., quantitative and qualitative methods) to explore how individuals consider risk tolerance as it relates to their financial situation.…”
Section: Summary and Quantitative Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation