2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the gap: Increased inter-letter spacing as a means of improving reading performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion, however, has been criticized by Skottun and Skoyles (2012) who pointed out that Zorzi et al (2012) misinterpreted the lack of a significant result in the non-impaired control group as prove for the absence of an effect. And indeed, facilitated word recognition under conditions of increased inter-letter spacing has been reported also for nonimpaired readers in experiments using the lexical decision task (Perea and Gomez, 2012a;Perea et al, 2011Perea et al, , 2012Dotan and Katzir, 2018). In addition, investigations of sentence and text reading using eye movement recordings revealed significantly shorter fixation durations but higher fixation counts (i.e., average numbers of fixations per word) if letter spacing was wider (Perea and Gomez, 2012b;Slattery and Rayner, 2013;Perea et al, 2016;Weiss et al, 2016;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This conclusion, however, has been criticized by Skottun and Skoyles (2012) who pointed out that Zorzi et al (2012) misinterpreted the lack of a significant result in the non-impaired control group as prove for the absence of an effect. And indeed, facilitated word recognition under conditions of increased inter-letter spacing has been reported also for nonimpaired readers in experiments using the lexical decision task (Perea and Gomez, 2012a;Perea et al, 2011Perea et al, , 2012Dotan and Katzir, 2018). In addition, investigations of sentence and text reading using eye movement recordings revealed significantly shorter fixation durations but higher fixation counts (i.e., average numbers of fixations per word) if letter spacing was wider (Perea and Gomez, 2012b;Slattery and Rayner, 2013;Perea et al, 2016;Weiss et al, 2016;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Materials for this phase consisted of two age-appropriate lists of 24 Hebrew words each, one for each age group, taken from norms (Morag, 2010, Unpublished; see also Dotan and Katzir, 2018; Hadad et al, 2018). All words were two-syllables, 3–5 letter nouns with relatively high frequency (4 or 5 on a 1–5 scale, as rated by 10 elementary school teachers; Morag, 2010, Unpublished).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic parameters such as text complexity (Rayner & Duffy, 1986;Trauzettel-Klosinski et al, 2010), its syntax (von der Malsburg et al, 2015;von der Malsburg & Vasishth, 2013), word length and word frequency (Reichle et al, 1998;Tiffin-Richards & Schroeder, 2015) can influence eye movements. Consequently, intervention strategies should account for the importance of perceptual parameters such as the properties of fonts (e.g., spacing), which are another aspect that has been shown to affect reading performance (Dotan & Katzir, 2018;Hakvoort et al, 2017;Hermena, 2021;Rayner et al, 2010;Sjoblom et al, 2016;Zorzi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Effects Of Word Length and Word Frequency Among Dyslexic Adh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic parameters such as text complexity ( 67 ; 93 ), its syntax ( 95 ; 96 ), word length and word frequency ( 73 ; 92 ) can influence eye movements. Consequently, intervention strategies should account for the importance of perceptual parameters such as the properties of fonts (e.g., spacing), which are another aspect that has been shown to affect reading performance ( 20 ; 30 ; 33 ; 71 ; 84 ; 108 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%