2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the gap: Keeping UV lesions in check

Abstract: Cells respond to genotoxic insults by triggering a DNA damage checkpoint surveillance mechanism and by activating repair pathways. Recent findings indicate that the two processes are more related than originally thought. Here we discuss the mechanisms involved in responding to UV-induced lesions in different phases of the cell cycle and summarize the most recent data in a model where Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) and exonucleolytic activities act in sequence leading to checkpoint activation in non replicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(92 reference statements)
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore examined the formation of CPDs, the most abundant UV light-induced DNA lesion. CPDs are formed by the covalent linkage of the ring carbon 5 (C5) and C6 bonds of adjacent pyrimidines (37). Immediately after UVC exposure, CPD formation was significantly higher in fibroblasts from AGS and SLE patients compared with WT fibroblasts ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Carriers Of Ags Mutations Frequently Develop Sle-associated mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore examined the formation of CPDs, the most abundant UV light-induced DNA lesion. CPDs are formed by the covalent linkage of the ring carbon 5 (C5) and C6 bonds of adjacent pyrimidines (37). Immediately after UVC exposure, CPD formation was significantly higher in fibroblasts from AGS and SLE patients compared with WT fibroblasts ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Carriers Of Ags Mutations Frequently Develop Sle-associated mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conceivable that lack of repair in NTera2 cells resulting from the repair-shielding role of HMGB4 will block S-phase progression because the lesions impede DNA polymerases (37). To investigate this possibility, we treated NTera2 and NTera2 HMGB4 −/− cells with cisplatin (2 μM) and used flow cytometry to assay cell cycle progression using ModFit.…”
Section: Hmgb4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nature of this response differs depending of the phase of the cell cycle. Although it has been established that UV lesions trigger a cell cycle arrest during replication in the S phase, the discovery and characterization of UV-induced damaged response in G 0 / G 1 cells is more recent (Novarina et al 2011). Because only this latter response is connected to NER, it will be the exclusive subject of our discussion.…”
Section: The Role Of Ner In Uv-induced Dna Damage Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a principal signal for activation of the DNA-damage response is a long stretch of ssDNA covered with RPA. Such filaments bind the ATR-ATRIP complex activating the ATR kinase activity and triggering downstream signals (Zou and Elledge 2003;Novarina et al 2011). Although an RPAcovered stretch of ssDNA is formed during NER following the incision reaction, this intermediate is short-lived and the ssDNA stretch not long enough to activate full ATR signaling.…”
Section: The Role Of Ner In Uv-induced Dna Damage Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%