2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9787.00257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the Gaps: The Evolution of Regional Earnings Inequalities in the U.K., 1982–1997

Abstract: In this paper we apply earnings equations for U.K. regions over 1982-1997. We find evidence of rapid convergence across regions regarding the determinants of individual wages (i.e., regional fixed-effects, gender gaps, and returns to education and experience). In contrast, data on average regional earnings point to a worsening of U.K. regional inequalities and a rise in the North-South gap. Education accounts for most of the discrepancy between aggregate divergence and disaggregated convergence. First, London … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
92
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Observations were weighted by the number of patients still at risk in the hospitals. 10 We selected the region with the highest survival function (Alsace), the region with the lowest survival function (Languedoc-Roussillon), and the Paris region (Ile-de-France) that is the most densely populated. Graph 4 represents the survival functions of these three regions as well as their confidence intervals (Graph A1 in appendix represents the survival functions for all the regions and Table A1 ranks the regions according to survival after 15 days).…”
Section: Preliminary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Observations were weighted by the number of patients still at risk in the hospitals. 10 We selected the region with the highest survival function (Alsace), the region with the lowest survival function (Languedoc-Roussillon), and the Paris region (Ile-de-France) that is the most densely populated. Graph 4 represents the survival functions of these three regions as well as their confidence intervals (Graph A1 in appendix represents the survival functions for all the regions and Table A1 ranks the regions according to survival after 15 days).…”
Section: Preliminary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of regional per capita income inequality based on household data in Western Europe finds that the overwhelming part of overall inequality is intra-regional rather than inter-regional, or between countries (Rodríguez-Pose and Tselios 2008). Another micro data-based study suggests that agglomeration is likely to generate inequality in income distribution between individuals in leading and lagging regions (Duranton and Monastiriotis 2002). In yet another, more theoretical paper, the authors suggest that even if inequality increases, the relatively disadvantaged in the lagging regions might still be better off in absolute terms (Fujita and Thisse 2003).…”
Section: Regional Divergence Agglomeration and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dumond el al. 1999;Duranton and Monastiriotis 2002;Bernard et al 2003;Goetz and Rupasingha 2004), but regional comparison between entrepreneurs and wage earners has been largely ignored in the literature. We ask: does the education attained by an individual imply a higher rate of return for the entrepreneur than for the wage earner and are there regional differences in these returns?…”
Section: Regional Differences In Returns To Education For Entrepreneumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on regional wage differentials are commonly based on aggregate level approaches, which are incapable of yielding explanations or sources for regional inequalities in returns to education (see e.g. Duranton and Monastiriotis, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%