2018
DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind The (Profit) Gap: Why Are Female Enterprise Owners Earning Less than Men?

Abstract: We explore potential causes for the well-documented profit gap between male- and female-owned microenterprises in low-income countries. We use rich data from an ongoing field project in Ghana's garment making sector, and our study sample consists of all garment making firms in a midsize district capital. Even within the same industry, male-owned firms earn nearly twice as much profit as female-owned firms. Furthermore, we find the large and persistent gender difference in profits cannot be explained by our ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of this work focuses on micro-scale establishments, often informal and with few paid employees, in specific industries to identify differences across gender in observables such as revenue and investment. 5 For instance, Hardy and Kagy (2018) show that micro-scale female establishments earn less profit than males in a garment sector in Ghana, and de Mel et al (2009) show that returns are lower for female grant recipients in Sri Lanka potentially due to less control over household bargaining. My paper connects to this literature by measuring misallocation among formal establishments from a macro approach, providing an additional view of the barriers to production by gender among a more skilled set of the population, and for an expansive set of countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this work focuses on micro-scale establishments, often informal and with few paid employees, in specific industries to identify differences across gender in observables such as revenue and investment. 5 For instance, Hardy and Kagy (2018) show that micro-scale female establishments earn less profit than males in a garment sector in Ghana, and de Mel et al (2009) show that returns are lower for female grant recipients in Sri Lanka potentially due to less control over household bargaining. My paper connects to this literature by measuring misallocation among formal establishments from a macro approach, providing an additional view of the barriers to production by gender among a more skilled set of the population, and for an expansive set of countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can seek the steady pay of a formal wage job, but few are available. 1 They can start a business, but that revenue can also be volatile and most microenterprises earn small or negative profits (de Mel et al, 2009;Rutherford & Chatterjee, 2019;Breza & Kinnan, 2018;Hardy & Kagy, 2018). They can invest in other assets, like livestock or bank accounts (Barrett, Bellemare, & Osterloh, 2006), but these can be costly, difficult and risky (Narayan, Patel, Schafft, Rademacher, & Koch-Schulte, 2000;Dupas, Karlan, Robinson, & Ubfal, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, by examining how demand shocks affect intra-firm gender wage gap, I relate to the gender wage gap literature, specifically with studies that investigate the relationship between gender wage inequality and firm-specific pay policies (Card et al (2016), Black and Strahan (2001), Goldin et al (2017)). Finally, my paper contributes to the expanding literature on how female leadership affects outcomes of firms (Hardy and Kagy (2018), Bertrand et al (2014), Flabbi et al (2016), Gagliarducci et al (2015), Cardoso and Winter-Ebmer (2010)). It relates closely to Hardy and Kagy (2018), who studied the effect of demand shocks on the gender profit gap between male and female-owned firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Finally, my paper contributes to the expanding literature on how female leadership affects outcomes of firms (Hardy and Kagy (2018), Bertrand et al (2014), Flabbi et al (2016), Gagliarducci et al (2015), Cardoso and Winter-Ebmer (2010)). It relates closely to Hardy and Kagy (2018), who studied the effect of demand shocks on the gender profit gap between male and female-owned firms. Since both Cardoso and Winter-Ebmer (2010) and Flabbi et al (2016) find effects of female leadership on wages, I examine the heterogeneous effect of demand-shocks on wages by ownership of firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation