2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.625343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind Wandering Influences EEG Signal in Complex Multimodal Environments

Abstract: The phenomenon of mind wandering (MW), as a family of experiences related to internally directed cognition, heavily influences vigilance evolution. In particular, humans in teleoperations monitoring partially automated fleet before assuming manual control whenever necessary may see their attention drift due to internal sources; as such, it could play an important role in the emergence of out-of-the-loop (OOTL) situations and associated performance problems. To follow, quantify, and mitigate this phenomenon, el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the spectral profile identified for mind wandering in Rodriguez-Larios & Alaerts (2020) looks highly similar to the one that we associated to drowsiness in the current study (see Figure 5E this paper and Figure 2 in Rodriguez-Larios & Alaerts (2020)). Together, our results support the idea that mind wandering is associated to a relative increase in alpha power in different cognitive tasks (Boudewyn & Carter, 2018;Compton et al, 2019;Gouraud et al, 2021;Jin et al, 2019Jin et al, , 2020 and we hypothesize that previous inconsistencies in the literature could be explained by confounders such as motor preparation, meta-awareness and drowsiness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the spectral profile identified for mind wandering in Rodriguez-Larios & Alaerts (2020) looks highly similar to the one that we associated to drowsiness in the current study (see Figure 5E this paper and Figure 2 in Rodriguez-Larios & Alaerts (2020)). Together, our results support the idea that mind wandering is associated to a relative increase in alpha power in different cognitive tasks (Boudewyn & Carter, 2018;Compton et al, 2019;Gouraud et al, 2021;Jin et al, 2019Jin et al, , 2020 and we hypothesize that previous inconsistencies in the literature could be explained by confounders such as motor preparation, meta-awareness and drowsiness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The most consistent finding from studies using experience sampling and EEG during meditation practice is a relative decrease in alpha amplitude in mind wandering relative to states of focused attention (Braboszcz & Delorme, 2011;Brandmeyer & Delorme, 2018;van Son et al, 2019). However, these findings directly contradict previous literature showing that mind wandering during different cognitive tasks is associated to a relative increase in alpha amplitude (Boudewyn & Carter, 2018;Compton et al, 2019;Gouraud et al, 2021;Groot et al, 2021;Jin et al, 2019Jin et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, neural measures provide a direct window into the dynamics of the neurocognitive processes underlying covert mental states such as mind-wandering. Based on robust markers, the exquisite temporal resolution inherent to electromagnetic measures of brain activity allows for the real-time detection of mental states, opening avenues for the online mitigation of adverse outcomes linked to mind-wandering (Gouraud et al, 2021) and ultimately, the obviation of subjective methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying electrophysiological correlates of mind-wandering has long been a goal within the field with early scalp EEG studies mainly investigating event-related potentials (ERPs). Early potentials such as P1 and N1, which reflect evoked responses to sensory stimuli, have been found to decrease when participants reported being engaged in TUT (Baird et al, 2014; Dong et al, 2021; Gouraud et al, 2021; Julia W. Y. Kam et al, 2010; Martel et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%