2006
DOI: 10.1080/02699050600832742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MINDFIM: A measure of disability in high-functioning traumatic brain injury outpatients

Abstract: MINDFIM is valid and useful measure of disability in TBI outpatients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The successful summation of the 18 FIM™ items in the current study places emphasis on the higher order construct of functional independence, incorporating both motor and cognitive aspects. Likewise, the Rasch analysis performed supports the theory that, when activities of daily living are observed, motor activities reflect some cognitive aspects and vice versa (18,37). From a clinical perspective, the FIM™ offers different levels of granularity for reporting.…”
Section: Transformation Tablesupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The successful summation of the 18 FIM™ items in the current study places emphasis on the higher order construct of functional independence, incorporating both motor and cognitive aspects. Likewise, the Rasch analysis performed supports the theory that, when activities of daily living are observed, motor activities reflect some cognitive aspects and vice versa (18,37). From a clinical perspective, the FIM™ offers different levels of granularity for reporting.…”
Section: Transformation Tablesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, in clinical practice both the reporting of 2 separate motor and cognitive total scores and the reporting of a single total score of the FIM™, is evident (7,9,11). Since this first Rasch analysis of the FIM™, many others have been published, mostly on its motor subscale (17), but also on adaptations of the FIM™ (18,19). More recently, the issue of so-called local item dependency has received attention (20).…”
Section: Patients: a Calibration Sample Containing 946 Cases Of Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also an indication of the practical usefulness of the instrument (Cantagallo et al, 2006). This is also an indication of the practical usefulness of the instrument (Cantagallo et al, 2006).…”
Section: External Validation Of the Scalementioning
confidence: 86%