2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness meditation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot study ☆

Abstract: The objectives of this pilot study were to assess the feasibility of recruitment and adherence to an eight-session mindfulness meditation program for community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to develop initial estimates of treatment effects. It was designed as a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants were 37 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older with CLBP of moderate intensity occurring daily or almost every day. Participants were randomized to an 8-w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
395
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 446 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
395
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean number of participants who handed in a diary every week (one page per week) was 18 (range [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The first three weeks 26, 22, and 23 participants, respectively, handed in a diary.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean number of participants who handed in a diary every week (one page per week) was 18 (range [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The first three weeks 26, 22, and 23 participants, respectively, handed in a diary.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median short-term follow-up time was eight weeks (range 4-12 weeks). Figure 3.3 shows a positive effect of meditation on pain from 0-12 weeks in 17 studies (Brown and Jones, 2013;Cash et al, 2015;Cathcart et al, 2014;Esmer et al, 2010;Morone, Greco, and Weiner, 2008;Omidi and Zargar, 2014;Plews-Ogan et al, 2005;Teixeira, 2010;Wells et al, 2014;Zautra et al, 2008;Parra-Delgado and LatorrePostigo, 2013;Rahmani and Talepasand, 2015;Gaylord et al, 2011;Ljotsson, Falk, et al, 2010), which was statistically significant in five studies Omidi and Zargar, 2014;Wells et al, 2014;Rahmani and Talepasand, 2015;Gaylord et al, 2011). The pooled analysis of all 24 RCTs showed a significant positive effect (SMD 0.27; CI 0.04, 0.50; 24 RCTs; I 2 64.6%).…”
Section: Chronic Pain Treatment Response Standardized Mean Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Seven studies obtained a "good" quality rating Fogarty et al, 2015;Ljotsson, Falk, et al, 2010;Parra-Delgado and Latorre-Postigo, 2013;Zautra et al, 2008). Ten studies were judged to be of fair quality, primarily due to being unclear in some aspects of the methods (Cash et al, 2015;Davis and Zautra, 2013;Day et al, 2014;Dowd et al, 2015;Gaylord et al, 2011;la Cour and Petersen, 2015;Morone, Greco, and Weiner, 2008;Wells et al, 2014). Eleven studies were judged to be poor; eight of these were primarily due to issues with completeness of reporting outcome data, such as inadequate or missing ITT analysis or less than 80-percent follow-up Brown and Jones, 2013;Cathcart et al, 2014;Esmer et al, 2010;Meize-Grochowski et al, 2015;Morone et al, 2009;Omidi and Zargar, 2014;PlewsOgan et al, 2005).…”
Section: Study Quality/risk Of Bias For Individual Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations