Minding the Ecological Body: Neuropsychoanalysis and Ecopsychoanalysis

Abstract

Neuropsychoanalysis explores experimentally and theoretically the philosophically ancient discussion of the relation of mind and body, and seems well placed to overcome the problem of a “mindless” neuroscience and a “brainless” psychology and psychotherapy, especially when combined with a greater awareness that the body itself, not only the brain, provides the material substrate for the emergent phenomenon we call mind. However, the mind-brain-body is itself situated within a complex ecological world, interacting with other mind-brain-bodies and the “non-human environment.” This occurs both synchronically and diachronically as the organism and its environment (living and non-living) interact in highly complex often non-linear ways. Psychoanalysis can do much to help unmask the anxieties, deficits, conflicts, phantasies, and defenses crucial in understanding the human dimension of the ecological crisis. Yet, psychoanalysis still largely remains not only a “psychology without biology,” which neuropsychoanalysis seeks to remedy, but also a “psychology without ecology.” Ecopsychoanalysis (Dodds, 2011b; Dodds and Jordan, 2012) is a new transdisciplinary approach drawing on a range of fields such as psychoanalysis, psychology, ecology, philosophy, science, complexity theory, esthetics, and the humanities. It attempts to play with what each approach has to offer in the sense of a heterogeneous assemblage of ideas and processes, mirroring the interlocking complexity, chaos, and turbulence of nature itself. By emphasizing the way the mind-brain-body studied by neuropsychoanalysis is embedded in wider social and ecological networks, ecopsychoanalysis can help open up the relevance of neuropsychoanalysis to wider fields of study, including those who are concerned with what Wilson (2003) called “the future of life.”

The psychology of climate anxiety

“…65 The answer lies not only from work in individual psychotherapy, but in developing strong social networks of supportive relationships, and a living relationship with the natural world. 68 Community is crucial for collective resilience, as we are seeing in the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature itself can function as one of these containing spaces.…”

A cross-sectional survey of climate and COVID-19 crises in young people in Indian slums: context, psychological responses, and agency

“…Health professionals can empower young people to manage their mental health by making using of technology to self-monitor their mental health and promote peer support. 61 Finally it is important to develop ‘strong social networks of supportive relationships’ 62 and build the collective resilience of the community to deal with both climate change and pandemics such as COVID-19. 63 …”

Childhood Trauma, Personality, and Substance Use Disorder: The Development of a Neuropsychoanalytic Addiction Model

“…In correspondence to that, the presented studies exclusively tested linear models regarding the relationship between primary and higher order processes, as well as regarding their influence on the development of SUD. However, with respect to the nonlinear assumptions of AN-theory (82,188), future studies should investigate non-linear relationships to describe the complexity of these relationships in a more naturalistic manner (189). This might be achieved in future studies by the estimation of nonrecursive structural equation models in longitudinal settings.…”