2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindset and standardized testing over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
36
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mindset surveys were based largely on the Dweck (1999) survey, with slight changes including that we used "smart" in place of "intelligent," making the language less complex as modeled by Gunderson et al (2013). That said, the mindset surveys in the elementary mindset literature are far from standardized, with researchers incorporating several modifications such as adding domain-specific items (McCutchen et al, 2016), making surveys more age-appropriate (Gunderson et al, 2013), or removing items (e.g., Project for Education Research That Scales, 2015). Prior to our work, no survey had been developed to measure EM.…”
Section: Mindset Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our mindset surveys were based largely on the Dweck (1999) survey, with slight changes including that we used "smart" in place of "intelligent," making the language less complex as modeled by Gunderson et al (2013). That said, the mindset surveys in the elementary mindset literature are far from standardized, with researchers incorporating several modifications such as adding domain-specific items (McCutchen et al, 2016), making surveys more age-appropriate (Gunderson et al, 2013), or removing items (e.g., Project for Education Research That Scales, 2015). Prior to our work, no survey had been developed to measure EM.…”
Section: Mindset Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the theoretical framework of implicit theories (see Dweck, , and, for a meta‐analysis, Burnette, O'Boyle, VanEpps, Pollack, & Finkel, ) as well as empirical evidence suggesting the relationship between individuals’ mindsets and their academic achievement, such as math and reading (e.g., McCutchen, Jones, Carbonneau, & Mueller, ), L2 researchers have operationalized mindsets in dichotomy—fixed mindset (a belief that intelligence is a fixed trait) and growth mindset (a belief that intelligence can be developed)—and investigated their impact on learners’ approaches to L2 learning. Among a limited number of studies is Mercer and Ryan () who operationalized mindsets as “assumptions individuals make about various human attributes, such as intelligence or personality” (p. 437).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of mindset, "beliefs people have about the nature of human characteristics" (Murphy & Dweck, 2016, p. 127), was popularized by Dweck (2006), who posited that mindsets can affect one's motivation, and in turn, can have an impact on academic resilience and performance. Both grit (e.g., Duckworth et al, 2007;Strayhorn, 2013) and mindset (Claro, Paunesku, & Dweck, 2016;McCutchen, Jones, Carbonneau, & Mueller, 2016) have been linked to academic achievement. However, the recent literature on the link between these motivational constructs and academic performance has reported mixed findings (Bazelais, Lemay, & Doleck, 2016;West et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%