Mineral deposit studies in the Triassic to Jurassic magmatic arc of western Nevada and eastern California were conducted to characterize mineral deposits and systems hosted by the arc complex and to evaluate the arc complex for volcanogenic massive sulfide potential. Early to Middle Jurassic sedimentary gypsum deposits represent the oldest economic concentration of minerals in the study area. Middle Jurassic arc-related hydrothermal mineral deposit types within the complex include porphyry Cu, Cu skarn, Fe skarn, polymetallic replacement, polymetallic vein, and aluminosilicate deposits. The majority of these deposits are related to the Yerington supersystem, which comprises at least three individual mineral systems (Yerington, Ann Mason, and Bear systems), each of which produced porphyry Cu and related skarn, replacement, and vein deposits. During the Middle to Late Jurassic there was an apparent evolution from Cu-Fe porphyry-skarn systems to MoW porphyry-skarn systems with assock*ed Cu-Au quartz-tourmaline veins (for example, Risue Canyon and Meadow Lake mining districts). This metallogenic evolution is consistent with a maturing and thickening magmatic arc through time. However, the presence of Jurassic MoW systems may be a consequence of deeper erosion in these areas and may represent the eroded remnants of porphyry copper systems. Cretaceous deposit types related to emplacement of the Sierra Nevada batholith and unrelated to the evolution of the Triassic to Jurassic magmatic arc include W skarns (Gardnerville mining district), W veins, a low-F porphyry Mo deposit (Pine Nut deposit, Gardnerville mining district), and Au-Cu quartz-tourmaline veins (Peavine mining district). Tertiary deposits hosted by Triassic to Jurassic arc rocks include epithermal adularia-sericite and quartz-alunite veins (Ramsey and Peavine mining districts, respectively) and volcanogenic U deposits. Au-bearing polymetallic veins (for example, the Lucky Boy and Pamlico mining districts), barite veins, and volcanic-hosted magnetite deposits are of uncertain age and probably formed during more than one metallogenic event and more than one period of geologic time. The apparent absence of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits is a consequence of factors relating to the geologic setting of the Triassic to Jurassic arc complex exposed in the study area. These are (1) the dominance of shallow submarine and subaerial volcanism, (2) the scarcity of proximal volcanism in deep restricted basins, and (3) the absence of identified submarine felsic volcanic centers. the resource potential of the aluminosilicate deposit at the Blue Danube Mine in the Buckskin mining district (Binyon, 1946), the Dayton iron deposit in the Red Mountain mining district (Geehan, 1949), and the MacArthur copper oxide deposit in the Yerington mining district (Matson, 1952). The California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) and the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (NBMG) have conducted county mineral surveys (