1993
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(93)90118-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral dissolution rates in plot-scale field and laboratory experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
111
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured dissolution rates of minerals in a natural setting are typically slower by approximately 2 orders of magnitude than those measured in the laboratory (Swoboda-Colberg and Drever 1993). Experimental studies to determine feldspar dissolution rates indicate that feldspar dissolves congruently and that the reaction is surface-controlled, as opposed to volume-diffusion-controlled (Berner 1981;Sverdrup 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured dissolution rates of minerals in a natural setting are typically slower by approximately 2 orders of magnitude than those measured in the laboratory (Swoboda-Colberg and Drever 1993). Experimental studies to determine feldspar dissolution rates indicate that feldspar dissolves congruently and that the reaction is surface-controlled, as opposed to volume-diffusion-controlled (Berner 1981;Sverdrup 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O values of precipitation were buffered prior to reaching the groundwater-fed O values, also observed following rainfall, likely reflect the increased relative contribution of DFS shallow in groundwater-fed streams, with the rate of water flow through this pathway sufficient to minimize mineral dissolution (Swoboda-Colberg and Drever, 1993). Alternatively, evaporite deposits may be highly localized, and the DFS shallow flow pathway may bypass the minerals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exporting experimental rate constants to natural systems A number of processes have been suggested as factors in the "dissolution rate conundrum" or the discrepancy between field and laboratory rates, including changes in the intrinsic reactivity of mineral surfaces (Maher et al, 2006b), limitations on reactive surface area in natural porous media (White and Peterson, 1990;, limitations on flow and transport into low permeability zones in heterogeneous material (Clow and Drever, 1996;Malmstrom et al, 2004), slow precipitation of secondary minerals (Maher et al, 2006b), and transport rather than strict interface control of rates (Swoboda-Colberg and Drever, 1993;Clow and Drever, 1996;Steefel and Lichtner, 1998). Here we use geometric surface areas corrected for surface roughness, values that should be roughly equivalent to BET surface areas.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%