2000
DOI: 10.1080/14041040009362560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral extraction in a green and pleasant land: What is the effect of sustainable development policies on aggregates quarrying in the United Kingdom?*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is clear that future development on the scale predicted will require careful management if sustainable objectives are to be realized, not least because public opposition to unconstrained or poorly planned development threatens to deny access to important reserves. For example, in the UK, where competition for land use is high, the government has responded to pressure from non-government organizations (NGOs) by increasing the production price from non-traditional sources to limit the expansion of extraction operations into new areas (Morgan, 2000). In Canada, the public is also commonly opposed to aggregate extraction activities, mainly due to their proximity to urban centers (the "not in my back yard," or NIMBY, reaction; e.g., Barnett and Rowell, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is clear that future development on the scale predicted will require careful management if sustainable objectives are to be realized, not least because public opposition to unconstrained or poorly planned development threatens to deny access to important reserves. For example, in the UK, where competition for land use is high, the government has responded to pressure from non-government organizations (NGOs) by increasing the production price from non-traditional sources to limit the expansion of extraction operations into new areas (Morgan, 2000). In Canada, the public is also commonly opposed to aggregate extraction activities, mainly due to their proximity to urban centers (the "not in my back yard," or NIMBY, reaction; e.g., Barnett and Rowell, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%