“…XTG is ideal for the quantification of fabric intensity in clay‐rich fault gouge because it provides information for large numbers of small particles in three dimensions, and the analysis and sample preparation are straightforward. The XTG technique has been used to quantify phyllosilicate fabric intensity in the following four basic areas: (1) Identifying the relative roles of compaction and authigenic mineral growth in the mud‐to‐shale transition [ Sintubin , 1994b; Curtis et al , 1980; Ho et al , 1999; Aplin et al , 2006; Day‐Stirrat et al , 2008]; (2) assessing the relative roles of mechanical rotation, dissolution, and neocrystallization of micas in the shale‐to‐slate transition [ Holeywell and Tullis , 1975; Tullis and Wood , 1975; Sintubin , 1994a; Ho et al , 1995, 1996, 2001; Jacob et al , 2000]; (3) Assessing the symmetry of the preferred orientation of micas in phyllonitic and mylonitic rocks [ O'Brien et al , 1987]; and (4) Quantifying phyllosilicate fabric intensities in clay‐rich fault gouges [ Yan et al , 2001; Solum et al , 2003, 2005; Schleicher et al , 2009]. The technique has also been used to study spatial variations of strain, on the mm to m scale, in phyllosilicate‐rich rocks [ Oertel and Curtis , 1972; Holeywell and Tullis , 1975; Curtis et al , 1980; van der Pluijm et al , 1994; Ho et al , 1995].…”