1985
DOI: 10.3133/ofr85527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral resource assessment of the Ajo and Lukeville 1° by 2° quadrangles, Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-pedogenic calcretes and gypcretes have been identified and characterized in Australia, Europe, Africa, and (notably) in the western United States and Canada. As documented in mineral exploration surveys of broad uncontaminated areas, these accumulation zones contain the major constituents (calcite and/or gypsum) along with accessory minerals containing elements such as uranium (e.g., Peterson et al, 1985;Carlisle, 1978 and1980). Importantly, the topography and regional groundwater condition at Tuba City is closely akin to the sites where non-pedogenic mineral accumulation has been documented.…”
Section: Tuba City: Hydrologic Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Non-pedogenic calcretes and gypcretes have been identified and characterized in Australia, Europe, Africa, and (notably) in the western United States and Canada. As documented in mineral exploration surveys of broad uncontaminated areas, these accumulation zones contain the major constituents (calcite and/or gypsum) along with accessory minerals containing elements such as uranium (e.g., Peterson et al, 1985;Carlisle, 1978 and1980). Importantly, the topography and regional groundwater condition at Tuba City is closely akin to the sites where non-pedogenic mineral accumulation has been documented.…”
Section: Tuba City: Hydrologic Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%