1990
DOI: 10.1016/1040-6182(90)90037-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralogical and clay mineralogical aspects of loess research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The more abundant component of the lower portion is~5 μm, while that of the upper portion is~40 μm. As deep weathering could significantly decrease the particle size of the materials (Bronger and Heinkele, 1990;Sun, 2006), changes in particle size distribution of Xuancheng red soils are indicative of a downward increase in degree of weathering, in good agreement with the chemical indices.…”
Section: Bulk Geochemical Composition and Degree Of Weatheringsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The more abundant component of the lower portion is~5 μm, while that of the upper portion is~40 μm. As deep weathering could significantly decrease the particle size of the materials (Bronger and Heinkele, 1990;Sun, 2006), changes in particle size distribution of Xuancheng red soils are indicative of a downward increase in degree of weathering, in good agreement with the chemical indices.…”
Section: Bulk Geochemical Composition and Degree Of Weatheringsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A map showing the sample locations can be found in Chauvel et al (2014). Mineralogy, provenance and grain-size distribution for these deposits have been reported in previous studies such as Jeong et al (2008) and Bronger and Heinkele (1990) for the mineralogy of the Chinese loesses, Smith et al (2003) and Zárate (2003) for the source location of the Argentinian loesses, and Ding and Ding (2003) for the grain-size distribution of loesses from Tajikistan.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…0.8 µm are also observed in the grain size distribution curves of all three end-members. The generation of these fine grain peaks may be due to postdepositional pedogenesis, especially for particles < 2 µm (Bronger and Heinkele, 1990). However, since the dominant modal peaks are much coarser, weaker post-depositional weathering as suggested by MS is unlikely to have had a significant influence on the populations of EM1, EM2, or EM3 at NLK.…”
Section: Genetic Interpretations Of End-members In Loess Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%