“…Despite its importance, this data is rarely given in the literature. Of the most comparable studies in the literature (Boutron, 1979;Barrie and Vet, 1984;Semb et al, 1984;Laird et al, 1986;Maupetit and Delmas, 1992;Suttie and Wolff, 1992;Boutron et al, 1993;Wolff and Suttie, 1994;Barbaris and Betterton, 1996;Loranger et al, 1996;Hinkley et al, 1997;Snyder-Conn et al, 1997;Caritat et al, 1998;Gregurek et al, 1998Gregurek et al, , 1999aGregurek et al, , 1999bVeysseyre et al, 1998;Simonetti et al, 2000a;and Veysseyre et al, 2001), only Barrie and Vet (1984) similarly report reproducibility based on field duplicates-what they call "within-site differences." They concluded that a three-sample mean taken at a single site is within 25% of the areal mean at the 1 (75%) significance level and that this was only true for the major ions and not the metals they analysed.…”