2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2001.tb01945.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralogy of fine‐grained material in the Krymka (LL3.1) chondrite

Abstract: Abstract-Two dark lithic fragments and matrix of the Krymka LL3.1 chondrite were mineralogically and chemically studied in detail. These objects are characterised by the following chemical and mineralogical characteristics, which distinguish them from the host chondrite Krymka: (1) bulk chemical analyses revealed low totals (systematically lower than 94 wt%) due to high porosity; (2) enrichment in FeO and depletion in S, MgO and Si02 due to a high abundance of Fe-rich silicates and low sulfide abundance; (3) f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the DI of Lewis et al (1979), ours has probably experienced a slightly higher degree of thermal or hydrothermal alteration lowering the 20 Ne prim concentrations in particular and, thus, increasing the ( 36 Ar/ 20 Ne) prim ratio. Low temperature processing of our DI before its incorporation to the Krymka parent body was also concluded by Semenenko et al (2001). Despite slightly different alteration states, the extraordinarily high gas concentrations in both DIs argue for a common origin.…”
Section: Relationship Between Dark Inclusions and Rims And Matrixsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the DI of Lewis et al (1979), ours has probably experienced a slightly higher degree of thermal or hydrothermal alteration lowering the 20 Ne prim concentrations in particular and, thus, increasing the ( 36 Ar/ 20 Ne) prim ratio. Low temperature processing of our DI before its incorporation to the Krymka parent body was also concluded by Semenenko et al (2001). Despite slightly different alteration states, the extraordinarily high gas concentrations in both DIs argue for a common origin.…”
Section: Relationship Between Dark Inclusions and Rims And Matrixsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Most formation scenarios for DIs include the accretion of nebular dust to small or larger precursor bodies. Subsequently, these bodies are destroyed or single fragments of them are released by impacts to the nebular reservoir, from where the final accretion of the mmto cm-sized objects to the present-day host meteorites took place (Bischoff 1989;Bischoff et al 1988;Grady et al 1999;Johnson et al 1990;Kurat et al 1989;Semenenko et al 2001). The degrees of precursor body, nebular, and parent body alteration of the DIs are highly variable in these scenarios (e.g., Buchanan et al 1996;Kojima and Tomeoka 1997;Tomeoka and Kojima 1998).…”
Section: Relationship Between Dark Inclusions and Rims And Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) and exotic fragments in Dhajala (H3) and Krymka (LL3) were described as foreign fine‐grained, accretionary objects (Semenenko et al. ; Funk et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%