Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Theory: Communication skills are an essential component of undergraduate medical curricula across countries. Presently, young doctors still recognize gaps in their training in this filed. Despite the existence of a number of consensus statements and models concerning communication skills teaching within medical education, current training programs are widely heterogeneous and there is scarce common outcome-based research. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that undergraduate communication skills training programs, relying either on practice-oriented or theory-based teaching strategies and within a different time range, may influence young doctors' preparedness for practice regarding communication skills. The present study intends to inform educational background and to support further development of communication skills curricula. Methods: Two hundred sixty-six medical interns answered an original questionnaire specifically designed to explore how well they feel their undergraduate training had prepared them in key aspects of medical communication. Items comprised the competencies set out in published literature and the preliminary version of the questionnaire was scrutinized by undergraduate and postgraduate medical educators, as well as experts on communication inhealthcare. An Exploratory Factorial Analysis was performed and the instrument's psychometric properties were tested. Medical schools' curricula were reviewed, allowing characterization of curricular content, timing and number of curricular units covering communication skills teaching. In order to explore potential associations between academic curricula and medical interns' preparedness for practice, hypothesis testing with Mann-Whitney U tests for independent samples was performed.Results: Core communication and interviewing skill were highly rated. Perceived preparedness was lower in aspects concerning dealing with emotion, breaking bad news, and communicating with speech impaired patients. Interns who were offered a longitudinal integration of communication skills throughout the curriculum reported significantly higher levels of preparedness. Simulation with standardized patients and real patient interviewing with feedback on communication skills were the most valued strategies to positively influence preparedness.We found no evidence for the advantage of role play, didactic videos and patient-simulation with mannequins. Conclusion:The results of this study support the expansion of an educational model based on integrated communication skills training throughout undergraduate medical curriculum.Programs standing on a strong experimental component, particularly combining patientsimulation strategies with continuous supervision and learner centered feedback, significantly influenced preparedness. Efforts should be made to adopt such strategies in a customized and interactive format, tailored to medical students' different learning needs.
Theory: Communication skills are an essential component of undergraduate medical curricula across countries. Presently, young doctors still recognize gaps in their training in this filed. Despite the existence of a number of consensus statements and models concerning communication skills teaching within medical education, current training programs are widely heterogeneous and there is scarce common outcome-based research. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that undergraduate communication skills training programs, relying either on practice-oriented or theory-based teaching strategies and within a different time range, may influence young doctors' preparedness for practice regarding communication skills. The present study intends to inform educational background and to support further development of communication skills curricula. Methods: Two hundred sixty-six medical interns answered an original questionnaire specifically designed to explore how well they feel their undergraduate training had prepared them in key aspects of medical communication. Items comprised the competencies set out in published literature and the preliminary version of the questionnaire was scrutinized by undergraduate and postgraduate medical educators, as well as experts on communication inhealthcare. An Exploratory Factorial Analysis was performed and the instrument's psychometric properties were tested. Medical schools' curricula were reviewed, allowing characterization of curricular content, timing and number of curricular units covering communication skills teaching. In order to explore potential associations between academic curricula and medical interns' preparedness for practice, hypothesis testing with Mann-Whitney U tests for independent samples was performed.Results: Core communication and interviewing skill were highly rated. Perceived preparedness was lower in aspects concerning dealing with emotion, breaking bad news, and communicating with speech impaired patients. Interns who were offered a longitudinal integration of communication skills throughout the curriculum reported significantly higher levels of preparedness. Simulation with standardized patients and real patient interviewing with feedback on communication skills were the most valued strategies to positively influence preparedness.We found no evidence for the advantage of role play, didactic videos and patient-simulation with mannequins. Conclusion:The results of this study support the expansion of an educational model based on integrated communication skills training throughout undergraduate medical curriculum.Programs standing on a strong experimental component, particularly combining patientsimulation strategies with continuous supervision and learner centered feedback, significantly influenced preparedness. Efforts should be made to adopt such strategies in a customized and interactive format, tailored to medical students' different learning needs.
Background An assessment program should be inclusive and ensure that the various components of medical knowledge, clinical skills, and professionalism are assessed. The level and the variation over time in the strength of the correlation between these components of assessment is still a matter of study. Based on the meaningful learning theory and the integrated learning theory, we hypothesize that these components increase their connections during the medical school course. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study that analyzed data collected for a 10-year period in one medical school. We included students from the 3rd to 6th year of medical school from 2011 to 2021. Three assessment components were addressed: Knowledge, Clinical Skills, and Professionalism. For data analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients (R) and R 2 were calculated to study the correlation between variables and a z-test on Fisher's r-to-z was used to determine the differences between correlation coefficients. Results 949 medical students were included in the study. The correlation between Clinical Skills and Professionalism showed a medium to strong association (Pearson's R ranging from 0.485 to 0.734), while the correlation between Knowledge and Professionalism was weaker but exhibited a steady evolution with Pearson's R fluctuating between 0.075 and 0.218. The Knowledge and Clinical Skills correlation became statistically significant from 2013 onwards and peaking at Pearson's R of 0.440 for the cohort spanning 2016–2019. We also revealed a strengthening of correlations between Professionalism and Clinical Skills from the beginning to the end of clinical training, but not with the knowledge component. Conclusions This analysis contributes to our understanding of the dynamics of correlations of different assessment components within an institution and provides a framework for how they interact and influence each other. Trial registration This study was not a clinical trial, but a retrospective observational study, without health care interventions. Nevertheless, we provide herein the number of the study as submitted to the Ethics committee – CEICVS 146/2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-024-05822-3.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.