2009
DOI: 10.1107/s0909049508040612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mini-beam collimator enables microcrystallography experiments on standard beamlines

Abstract: The high-brilliance X-ray beams from undulator sources at third-generation synchrotron facilities are excellent tools for solving crystal structures of important and challenging biological macromolecules and complexes. However, many of the most important structural targets yield crystals that are too small or too inhomogeneous for a 'standard' beam from an undulator source, $ 25-50 mm (FWHM) in the vertical and 50-100 mm in the horizontal direction. Although many synchrotron facilities have microfocus beamline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). Beam sizes between 5 and 15 μm with a nearly circular cross-section were achieved by using minibeam collimators (20) in combination with focusing mirrors (Table S1). For beam sizes less than 5 μm, circular Fresnel zone plate optics (34) were used to focus the beam at the sample position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1). Beam sizes between 5 and 15 μm with a nearly circular cross-section were achieved by using minibeam collimators (20) in combination with focusing mirrors (Table S1). For beam sizes less than 5 μm, circular Fresnel zone plate optics (34) were used to focus the beam at the sample position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulations of photoelectron trajectories predicted that the greatest energy deposition in the photoelectron flight path was a few microns from the photoelectron origin, and that the photoelectrons would escape the illuminated crystal volume if the crystal (18) or the beam (19) were small relative to the photoelectron path length. Thus, there is a potential for reducing radiation damage if the incident X-ray beam size is decreased beyond the microbeams now in use, which are as small as 5-10 μm (20)(21)(22). Photoelectron transfer of energy out of the beam footprint causing "penumbral damage" is well known in radiology and has been observed in studies with high-energy (MeV) X-rays (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 25 SeMet TE crystals, only one diffracted beyond 4 Å, but was visibly two crystals and had multiple lattices in the diffraction pattern. A region visually identified as a single crystal was probed in three 10-m steps using a 20-m mini-beam (22). The crystal was centered at the position with the strongest diffraction and the least interference from the second lattice, and Friedel data were collected in inverse-beam geometry ( .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffraction quality of a crystal may vary over different regions. At the microfocus beamlines (discussed later) or those with mini-beam collimation to provide a small beam (Cherezov et al 2009;Fischetti et al 2009), it is possible to scan small areas within larger crystals to detect the best portion of the crystal for diffraction (Aishima et al 2010).…”
Section: Beamlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%