2022
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2104877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mini Nutritional Assessment for Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although GLIM has unified the diagnostic criteria for malnutrition to a certain extent, it remains an expert consensus, and its clinical effect still needs to be verified [ 38 ]. The applicability of MNA to Asians may be limited due to the absence of race-specific metrics, and the definition of BMI in MNA may need to be adapted to account for racial differences [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although GLIM has unified the diagnostic criteria for malnutrition to a certain extent, it remains an expert consensus, and its clinical effect still needs to be verified [ 38 ]. The applicability of MNA to Asians may be limited due to the absence of race-specific metrics, and the definition of BMI in MNA may need to be adapted to account for racial differences [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although malnutrition is common and nutritional assessment is critical, there is currently no universally accepted standard for nutritional assessment [ 17 , 18 ]. However, commonly used malnutrition assessment tools have limitations [ 19 ]. For example, PG-SGA is complex and time-consuming, and its results also depend on the experience of the observer [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 19 , 20 R+ Dietitian, a digital smartphone-based self-administered tool for nutritional risk screening (NRS), has demonstrated remarkable consistency in dietary assessment compared to assessments performed by professional dietitians. 21 The user interface of the R+ Dietitian is shown in Figure 1 , which includes collecting patients’ basic information, automatically conducting electronic nutritional assessments using the NRS-2002 tool and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA-SF) tool, 14 , 22 24 and evaluating energy and protein intake through the assessment of dietary intake of rice, meat, and milk. This digital tool holds great potential for practical implementation in real-world clinical nutritional assessment and support for cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%