2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01281-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mini-review: The Role of the Cerebellum in Visuomotor Adaptation

Abstract: The incredible capability of the brain to quickly alter performance in response to ever-changing environment is rooted in the process of adaptation. The core aspect of adaptation is to fit an existing motor program to altered conditions. Adaptation to a visuomotor rotation or an external force has been well established as tools to study the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor adaptation. In this mini-review, we summarize recent findings from the field of visuomotor adaptation. We focus on the idea that the cere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computationally, explicit and implicit processes for adaptation are constrained to solve different problems: Whereas explicit processes focus on goal attainment, implicit processes are designed to ensure that the selected movement is flawlessly executed (Taylor & Ivry, 2011). Consistent with this distinction, the deployment of aiming strategies to offset an experimentally imposed perturbation requires prefrontal control (Anguera et al, 2010;Benson et al, 2011;, whereas implicit adaptation is dependent on the integrity of the cerebellum (Butcher et al, 2017;Haar & Donchin, 2020;Hadjiosif et al, 2014;Izawa et al, 2012;Schlerf et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2010;Tseng et al, 2007;Tzvi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computationally, explicit and implicit processes for adaptation are constrained to solve different problems: Whereas explicit processes focus on goal attainment, implicit processes are designed to ensure that the selected movement is flawlessly executed (Taylor & Ivry, 2011). Consistent with this distinction, the deployment of aiming strategies to offset an experimentally imposed perturbation requires prefrontal control (Anguera et al, 2010;Benson et al, 2011;, whereas implicit adaptation is dependent on the integrity of the cerebellum (Butcher et al, 2017;Haar & Donchin, 2020;Hadjiosif et al, 2014;Izawa et al, 2012;Schlerf et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2010;Tseng et al, 2007;Tzvi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computationally, explicit and implicit processes for adaptation are constrained to solve different problems, whereas explicit processes focus on goal attainment, implicit processes are designed to ensure that the selected movement is flawlessly executed ( Taylor et al, 2011 ). Consistent with this distinction, the deployment of aiming strategies to offset an experimentally imposed perturbation requires prefrontal control ( Anguera et al, 2010 ; Benson et al, 2011 ; Taylor and Ivry, 2014a ), whereas implicit adaptation is dependent on the integrity of the cerebellum ( Butcher et al, 2017 ; Haar and Donchin, 2020 ; Hadjiosif et al, 2014 ; Izawa et al, 2012 ; Schlerf et al, 2013 ; Taylor et al, 2010 ; Tseng et al, 2007 ; Tzvi et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Implicit Adaptation Of the Sensorimotor Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recent evidence, however, suggests that multiple, qualitatively distinct processes contribute to the error reduction measured in adaptation paradigms ( Huberdeau et al, 2015 ; Krakauer et al, 2019 ). Along with an implicit component, likely dependent on cerebellar processes and outside of one’s awareness ( Tzvi et al, 2021 ), recalibration to imposed perturbations also rely to some degree on overt cognitive strategies, mainly driven by the explicit knowledge of the presence of the imposed perturbation ( Taylor and Ivry, 2012 ). Since implicit and explicit components both contribute to the measured adaptation response, distinguishing between their relative contribution is nontrivial.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%