2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturization of environmental chemical assays in flowing systems: The lab-on-a-valve approach vis-à-vis lab-on-a-chip microfluidic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Readers are referred to a recent comprehensive review by Miró and Hansen [16] for a critical discussion of pros and cons of LOV as compared to LOC Microsystems for automated SPE.…”
Section: Lab-on-valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to a recent comprehensive review by Miró and Hansen [16] for a critical discussion of pros and cons of LOV as compared to LOC Microsystems for automated SPE.…”
Section: Lab-on-valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the low flow resistance of short and wide flow conduits allows precise flow manipulation, and the use of ultra fast bursts of flow that can wash out the channels rapidly and easily remove stray air bubbles or clogging particles. Readers are referred to a recently published comprehensive review article for a detailed and critical comparison of LOV and LOC micromachined units (84).…”
Section: X6 Microfluidic Devices: Lab-on-valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 It has now been recognized as a universal tool for the accommodation of a wide variety of micro-scale analytical processes. 8 Later, Cerda proposed a chip-on-valve for the miniaturization of multisyringe flow-injection analysis. 9,10 The analyzer included a special panel equipped by four syringes for one-off moving of the sample and reagent solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%