2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturization of Liquid-Liquid extraction; the barriers and the enablers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 227 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to overcome the problem of using a high volume of organic solvents, several miniaturized liquid-extraction techniques have been developed such as liquid-liquid microextraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. [73][74][75] The main advantage of liquid-liquid microextraction (m-LLE) is that it does not require special equipment, while the main disadvantage is that its extraction efficiency is lower than conventional liquid extraction. In the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method, a mixture of two solvents (extraction solvent and disperser) is injected by syringe into the aqueous sample.…”
Section: Liquid Extraction (Le)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to overcome the problem of using a high volume of organic solvents, several miniaturized liquid-extraction techniques have been developed such as liquid-liquid microextraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. [73][74][75] The main advantage of liquid-liquid microextraction (m-LLE) is that it does not require special equipment, while the main disadvantage is that its extraction efficiency is lower than conventional liquid extraction. In the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method, a mixture of two solvents (extraction solvent and disperser) is injected by syringe into the aqueous sample.…”
Section: Liquid Extraction (Le)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selectivity of the separation will be determined by the type of sorbent and eluent employed. 73,74 The choice of the sorbent depends on the nature of the analyte, of the matrix, and of the possible interferents. Of particular importance are the silica and polymeric sorbents, such as styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers.…”
Section: Solid-phase Extraction (Spe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details, including fundamentals and extensive classifications, can be found in recent reviews [474][475][476]. Among other clever approaches, it is worth mentioning the possibility to use the capillary to add solvents and mix the sample to determine tyrosine kinase inhibitors in plasma [384], additional uses of droplet extraction [477], including single bubble in-tube microextraction [478], and the use of alternative solvents [479] such as deep eutectic solvents [480] or ionic liquids [481].…”
Section: Passive Sample Pretreatment Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aligned with the principles of sustainability and green chemistry, liquid microextraction-based methods have arisen as a promising alternative for an efficient sample cleanup and/or analyte preconcentration. They have been mostly applied to organic compounds and, in less extension, to the separation of metal species [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Nonetheless, their implementation as routine methods in analytical laboratories has not been fully achieved, so further study and development is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, both extraction and re-extraction are done in a single step. Although a variety of approaches may be found, three methodologies can be distinguished: Single drop liquid-phase microextraction (SDME), dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) and hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) [ 6 , 28 ]. The application of these systems to the determination of cadmium in environmental waters has also been reviewed [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%