2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minified dose of urispas drug as better corrosion constraint for soft steel in sulphuric acid solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from Table 1 that after increasing the concentration of inhibitor, the inhibition efficiency increased, while the corrosion current density decreased due to adsorption of inhibitor molecule on the metal surface. The minor shift in E corr value towards positive direction in the presence of inhibitor as compared to the E corr value in the absence of inhibitor indicates that tested inhibitor acts as mixed type inhibitor [19]. Figure 3 shows the Nyquist diagrams for mild steel in 2 M H 3 PO 4 at 298 K containing various concentrations of CBT.…”
Section: Polarization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from Table 1 that after increasing the concentration of inhibitor, the inhibition efficiency increased, while the corrosion current density decreased due to adsorption of inhibitor molecule on the metal surface. The minor shift in E corr value towards positive direction in the presence of inhibitor as compared to the E corr value in the absence of inhibitor indicates that tested inhibitor acts as mixed type inhibitor [19]. Figure 3 shows the Nyquist diagrams for mild steel in 2 M H 3 PO 4 at 298 K containing various concentrations of CBT.…”
Section: Polarization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langmuir adsorption isotherm was derived based on the assumption that the adsorption surface possesses sites with equivalent/similar energies of adsorption, allowing maximum/saturated adsorption of solute molecules for adsorbent monolayer coverage [33]. It implies that molecules following Langmuir adsorption mechanism should have slope value of unity as predicted by Equation (S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Frumkin adsorption model is an isotherm type which explains the extent of lateral interactions among the adsorbed molecules on adsorbent surface [33], the linear form used herein (see supporting information for Equation (S6)), where C is the inhibitor concentration, θ is surface coverage, “ α ” is the Frumkin lateral interaction constant describing the interaction in adsorbed layer and K Fr is the adsorption equilibrium constant obtained from Frumkin isotherm. The values of K Fr and “ α ” were derived respectively from the intercepts and slopes of Figure 4e,f (Equation (S6)) for the studied molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaouiki et al [12] studied the synthetic organic compounds, i.e., 4-(isopentylamino)-3-nitrobenzonitrile and 3-amino-4-(isopentylamino)benzonitrile for corrosion inhibition of mild steel in a 1.0 M HCl solution and reported that 4-(isopentylamino)-3-nitrobenzonitrile resulted in improvements to inhibition efficiency. Other synthetic organics, such as 1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate and 1-hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [13], clopidogrel [14], p-vinyl benzene sulfonate and vinyl sulfonate-functionalized polyvinyl alcohol [15], 4-mercaptopyridine-modified sodium dodecyl sulfate [16], 1H-perimidine and 1H-perimidin-2-amine [17], tetrazole derivatives [18], 4-((2,3dichlorobenzylidene)amino)-3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole-5(4H)-thione [19], 5-aminopyrazole carbonitriles [20], 2-(1-piperidyl)ethyl 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-phenylchromene-8-carboxylate [21], and 1-(2-ami-noethyl)-1-dodecyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-1-ium chloride [22] have been investigated as corrosion inhibitors for the protection of mild steel in HCl, H 2 SO 4 , and phosphoric acid solution at room temperature. e results confirmed that the compounds reported an inhibition efficiency in the range of 57.1-81.4% [15], 97.0-98.6% [16], 34.6-92.3% [17], 71.1-94.2% [19], 56.8-95.5% [20], 91.2-97.9% [21], and 80.6-99.2% [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%