2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale

Abstract: These results are consistent with the recently published findings generated by different methods and support the use of a "much better" improvement on the pain relief as a clinically important outcome. A further confirmation in other patient populations and different chronic pain syndromes will be needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
893
7
16

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,276 publications
(948 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
32
893
7
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The NRS pain report decreased by 1 point during the treatment, a clinically significant effect, 17 which was maintained at follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The NRS pain report decreased by 1 point during the treatment, a clinically significant effect, 17 which was maintained at follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Secondary outcome measures included the following self-reported questionnaires: numerical pain rating scale (11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10) during activity and at rest [8,39]; Oxford Hip and Knee Score (12-item scale measuring pain and physical function) [10,11]; SF-12 Generic Health Survey (generic quality-of-life measure with two components-a physical component summary and a mental component summary [MCS]) [29,41,45]; University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score (with 10 descriptive activity levels ranging from wholly inactive and dependent on others [level one], sometimes [34,48]; and a patient-reported global rating of change (GRC) score for measuring self-perceived change in physical activity (measured postoperatively using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from very much worse to very much better) [16,23]. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics (Version 19; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of significance was set at p\0.05. To demonstrate the effectiveness of a treatment, a minimal clinically important difference in VAS scores for pain has been reported ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 [9,19,28] and, in DASH score, ranging from 7 to 13.5 [11,20,21]. However, other measurements do not have the reported minimal clinically significant differences.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%