“…Let χ, ψ ∈ X such that χ ∈ Irr(G|Z(G)) and ψ ∈ nl(G/Z(G)). Then ker χ < Z(G) ≤ ker ψ ⇒ ker χ ∩ ker ψ = ker χ and this contradict equation (11). Therefore, X must be a subset of Irr(G|Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since G has exactly two character degrees, all the Sylow subgroups of G, except one, are abelian. = c(G) (see [12]).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let χ be an arbitrary irreducible character in Irr(G|Z(G)). Then χ ↓ Z(G) = χ(1)λ, where λ ∈ lin(Z(G)), and (11) ker χ = ker λ < Z(G) < G ′ , ∀ χ ∈ Irr(G|Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence X ⊆ nl(G) = Irr(G|Z(G)) ⊔ nl(G/Z(G)) (disjoint union). Further, since X must satisfy equation (11), X can't be a subset of nl(G/Z(G)). Now, suppose X intersect with Irr(G|Z(G)) and nl(G/Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of c(G), q(G) and µ(G) have been done by several reseachers in past. The interested reader may refer to [1,2,3,4,5,7,11,12,25,26]. It is easy to see that for a finite group G, we have the following relation between µ(G), c(G), q(G) :…”
For a finite group G, we denote by µ(G) and c(G), the minimal degree of faithful permutation representation of G and the minimal degree of faithful representation of G by quasi-permutation matrices over the complex field C. In this paper we examine c(G) for V Z-groups and Camina p-groups.
“…Let χ, ψ ∈ X such that χ ∈ Irr(G|Z(G)) and ψ ∈ nl(G/Z(G)). Then ker χ < Z(G) ≤ ker ψ ⇒ ker χ ∩ ker ψ = ker χ and this contradict equation (11). Therefore, X must be a subset of Irr(G|Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since G has exactly two character degrees, all the Sylow subgroups of G, except one, are abelian. = c(G) (see [12]).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let χ be an arbitrary irreducible character in Irr(G|Z(G)). Then χ ↓ Z(G) = χ(1)λ, where λ ∈ lin(Z(G)), and (11) ker χ = ker λ < Z(G) < G ′ , ∀ χ ∈ Irr(G|Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence X ⊆ nl(G) = Irr(G|Z(G)) ⊔ nl(G/Z(G)) (disjoint union). Further, since X must satisfy equation (11), X can't be a subset of nl(G/Z(G)). Now, suppose X intersect with Irr(G|Z(G)) and nl(G/Z(G)).…”
Section: Camina P-group Of Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of c(G), q(G) and µ(G) have been done by several reseachers in past. The interested reader may refer to [1,2,3,4,5,7,11,12,25,26]. It is easy to see that for a finite group G, we have the following relation between µ(G), c(G), q(G) :…”
For a finite group G, we denote by µ(G) and c(G), the minimal degree of faithful permutation representation of G and the minimal degree of faithful representation of G by quasi-permutation matrices over the complex field C. In this paper we examine c(G) for V Z-groups and Camina p-groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.