1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.152.1383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Electromagnetic Currents and Commutation Relations

Abstract: It is pointed out that within the quark model the equal-time commutation relations of currents provide us with a test of minimal electromagnetic interaction of the hadrons. When compared with experiment, the modifications of the Cabibbo-Radicati and Drell-Hearn sum rules resulting from nonminimal interactions may possibly fix the magnitudes of the isoscalar and the isovector Pauli interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[40]), the results presented here should provide a useful test for the form proposed by Chang and Liang [39]. While the isoscalar FFR sum rule would likely provide the most sensitive check on any such contribution, the phenomenological evaluation of the associated integral is not yet sufficiently stable for more than an order-of-magnitude test.…”
Section: Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[40]), the results presented here should provide a useful test for the form proposed by Chang and Liang [39]. While the isoscalar FFR sum rule would likely provide the most sensitive check on any such contribution, the phenomenological evaluation of the associated integral is not yet sufficiently stable for more than an order-of-magnitude test.…”
Section: Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[40] mentioned in passing that a similar procedure could be used to determine modifications to the FFR sum rule.…”
Section: Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the hard-pion philosophy one can assume that Imr^s) =0 for 4^ s ^ s 0 . Then, if Imt x c (s) = 0 and ImT^s) = 0 for 4 < s ^ s 0 , from (5a) and (6b), ^=0, which is a weak form of the so-called 8 fd?n 2 pV(m 2 )/m 2 = -2F v 2 m [Note that we have made no appeal to meson dom-inance, or even assumed the existence of any resonances,,] If we adopt this approximation, the absence of spurious poles in A 7 (s), computed from (8) and (11), suggests f 1 =0. Now evaluate Eq.…”
Section: F(0) = L+o(t C ) + O(m*b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations implied by (8) are readily found to be 2^v.. a2s * + /> fe <? V .. a2S = 0, a ra2S .p0 ai ... a2s + 2mx v .. a2S _/=O, which, upon inclusion of minimal coupling, yield as the equation of motion for the independent components <p…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U (pS) is the nucleon spinor, F 1,..., 8 are invariant amplitudes that are otherwise independent if gauge invariance is not required. The Ward identity Eq.…”
Section: Gauge Invariance and The Structure Of The Em Current-curmentioning
confidence: 99%