2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218216519400029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal hard surface-unlink and classical unlink diagrams

Abstract: Dedicated to Witold Rosicki on his 65th birthday.Abstract. We describe a method for generating minimal hard prime surface-link diagrams. We extend the known examples of minimal hard prime classical unknot and unlink diagrams up to three components and generate figures of all minimal hard prime surface-unknot and surface-unlink diagrams with prime base surface components up to ten crossings.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moves J R and J R are independent of each another, because J R (as oppose to J R ) move changes the number of triple-crossings of name eY (in an sPD code of the diagram) shown in Figure 19, therefore we have the following. We denote this set as Sh n , and generate every element of it just as in one of the authors earlier papers (in [5,Section 3.]). The enumeration of elements of this set (for an even n) is presented in Table 1 (second column), we associate each such projection with its PD code (described in that paper and in [4]).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The moves J R and J R are independent of each another, because J R (as oppose to J R ) move changes the number of triple-crossings of name eY (in an sPD code of the diagram) shown in Figure 19, therefore we have the following. We denote this set as Sh n , and generate every element of it just as in one of the authors earlier papers (in [5,Section 3.]). The enumeration of elements of this set (for an even n) is presented in Table 1 (second column), we associate each such projection with its PD code (described in that paper and in [4]).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we re-numerate each sPD code with consecutive positive integers from one up to three times the number of triple-crossings, with increasing labels as we go around each transverse circular component in the tripleprojection. An example is presented in Figure 13, where a knot diagram with code PD[X [1,4,2,5],X [3,8,4,9],X [12,6,13,5],X [13,16,14,1],X[9,14,10,15],X [15,10,16,11],X [6,12,7,11],X [7,2,8,3]] is transform, by contracting four edges labeled: 5,8,11,14, to a three-component link diagram with code sPD[eX [1,4,2,12,6,13],eX [4,9,3,3,7,2],eX [15,10,16,6,12,7],eX [1,13,...…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations