2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13644-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal methylation classifier (MIMIC): A novel method for derivation and rapid diagnostic detection of disease-associated DNA methylation signatures

Abstract: Rapid and reliable detection of disease-associated DNA methylation patterns has major potential to advance molecular diagnostics and underpin research investigations. We describe the development and validation of minimal methylation classifier (MIMIC), combining CpG signature design from genome-wide datasets, multiplex-PCR and detection by single-base extension and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, in a novel method to assess multi-locus DNA methylation profiles within routine clinically-applicable assays. We illus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results shed new light on a potential method for low-income countries based on a simple and feasible technique such as qPCR along with six probe/primer pairs plus reference genes with implementation of an approach recently described by Gómes and colleagues [3]. Their method fully discriminates between Group 3 and Group 4 based on the methylation status of 5 CpG’s, which is feasible for the real-time PCR platform through High Resolution Melting technology, and shall improve the molecular assignment [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results shed new light on a potential method for low-income countries based on a simple and feasible technique such as qPCR along with six probe/primer pairs plus reference genes with implementation of an approach recently described by Gómes and colleagues [3]. Their method fully discriminates between Group 3 and Group 4 based on the methylation status of 5 CpG’s, which is feasible for the real-time PCR platform through High Resolution Melting technology, and shall improve the molecular assignment [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R language and environment for statistical computing and graphics was used for bioinformatic analysis. The ComplexHeatmap and circlize packages were used for Heatmap generation [5, 6] and the ggplot2package [26, 32] was used for graphics generation. Rtsne [14, 10] was used for the visualization of t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and the NbClust and Factoextra packages [3, 11] were used to point out the best number of clusters and to visualize the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because only material of mostly low quantity and quality was available, the HIT-SIOP PNET 4 samples were unsuitable for subgroup assessment using conventional approaches (DNA methylation array 19 or mRNA expression analysis by Nanostring 20 ); therefore, we analysed all samples using a mass spectrometry-minimal methylation classifier (MS-MIMIC) assay to assess their molecular subgroup. 16 For the validation cohort, samples were of sufficient quality and quantity to do Illumina 450k DNA methylation microarray (62 DNA samples were from frozen material and eight were from FFPE tissue) and consensus methylation subgroup was assigned as described previously. 6 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Article, we report comprehensive molecular and pathological characterisation of the HIT-SIOP PNET 4 cohort using novel technologies 16 , 17 developed and adapted for assessment of the remnant tumour material. This analysis, alongside an independent, demographically matched, standard-risk medulloblastoma validation cohort, enabled the discovery and validation of concerted whole chromosomal aberration signatures with prognostic value for patients with non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA polymerase incorporates a single dideoxynucleotide triphosphate (ddNTP) that is complementary to the target base. Single base‐extended primer (i.e., SBE product) can be detected by various methods, including CE , MALDI‐TOF MS , surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy , and BeadChip array . However, all of these techniques are expensive, use high‐precision instruments, and require time‐consuming separation or cleanup/concentration of the SBE products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%