2021
DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2021000230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where

Abstract: Improvements in multiple myeloma therapy have led to deeper responses that are beyond the limit of detection by historical immunohistochemistry and conventional flow cytometry in bone marrow samples. In parallel, more sensitive techniques for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) through next-generation flow cytometry and sequencing have been developed and are now routinely available. Deep responses when measured by these assays correspond with improved outcomes and survival. We review the data supporting M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, our preliminary validation studies of two technical modifications of molecular and cell-based assays for detecting MM in the pB support a future perspective to develop gradual follow-up concepts for MM patients that schedule investigations of BM samples only when there is no evidence of disease in the pB. However, the pilot study presented here clearly is not sufficient to boost the so far only emerging clinical utility of liquid biopsies in MM [ 25 , 50 ]. Further studies in larger patient cohorts that directly compare NGS- and MFC-approaches are needed to fully establish the preferred method for minimally invasive monitoring of MM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Taken together, our preliminary validation studies of two technical modifications of molecular and cell-based assays for detecting MM in the pB support a future perspective to develop gradual follow-up concepts for MM patients that schedule investigations of BM samples only when there is no evidence of disease in the pB. However, the pilot study presented here clearly is not sufficient to boost the so far only emerging clinical utility of liquid biopsies in MM [ 25 , 50 ]. Further studies in larger patient cohorts that directly compare NGS- and MFC-approaches are needed to fully establish the preferred method for minimally invasive monitoring of MM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First, the use of advanced minimal residual disease (MRD) testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology with a minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10 5 nucleated cells is becoming more common place given studies suggesting this technology serves as an important prognostic factor [ 70 ]. While MRD testing via NGS is most commonly performed both at the end of induction therapy and post-auto-HSCT, the optimal timing of MRD testing in treating patients with relapsed MM remains a question [ 71 ]. Second, the sequencing of therapies in the relapsed MM patient population who have received an anti-BCMA targeting therapy (CAR-T therapies, belantamab-mafodotin) remains a debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in MM therapy have led to more profound responses that are beyond the limit of detection for residual disease by monoclonal proteins in the serum and urine and conventional bone marrow examination. Therefore, more sensitive techniques for assessing residual disease, including the next-generation flow cytometry and NGS, have been developed ( 30 ). In Japan, next-generation flow cytometry is available in clinical practice ( 31 ).…”
Section: Areas Where Further Investigation Is Requiredmentioning
confidence: 99%