1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02698548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal sets of foliations on complex projective spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The result was first proved by Camacho, Lins-Neto, Sad [12] for holomorphic foliations in P 2 and by Hurder-Mitsumatsu in the C 1 case. [ α ]dμ(α), then T = [ β ]dμ(β).…”
Section: Corollary 2 Assume There Is a Holomorphic Map φ : → (X L Ementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The result was first proved by Camacho, Lins-Neto, Sad [12] for holomorphic foliations in P 2 and by Hurder-Mitsumatsu in the C 1 case. [ α ]dμ(α), then T = [ β ]dμ(β).…”
Section: Corollary 2 Assume There Is a Holomorphic Map φ : → (X L Ementioning
confidence: 92%
“…If KC\ (J Sj = 0, then K corresponds to a compact minimal j=i j=i set of .^Icp^Sing^); but this is not possible because such a minimal set cannot support a holonomy invariant measure [CLS1]. Hence K intersects some sphere Si, and KnSi is a compact set saturated by the foliation Q\s,, which is a one -dimensional foliation with two hyperbolic closed leaves as limit set.…”
Section: Existence Of An Algebraic Leafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the transverse measure has support on the complement of the basin of attraction of the critical points. This set (the support of the measure) is a Riemann surface lamination and it is shown in [4] that there are no invariant transverse measures there.…”
Section: ->00mentioning
confidence: 99%