1982
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(82)90026-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal spanning tree subject to a side constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the above problems are polynomial-time solvable (see, e.g., [23]) in their unbudgeted version (k = 0), but become NP-hard [1,6] even for a single budget constraint (k = 1). For the case of one budget (k = 1), PTASs are known for spanning tree [35] (see also [21]), 1 The assumption that k is a constant is crucial in this paper, since many of the presented algorithms will have a running time that is exponential in k, but polynomial for constant k. 2 We recall that E is a finite ground set and I ⊆ 2 E is a nonempty family of subsets of E (independent sets) which have to satisfy the following two conditions: (i) I ∈ I, J ⊆ I ⇒ J ∈ I and (ii) I, J ∈ I, |I| > |J| ⇒ ∃z ∈ I \ J : J ∪ {z} ∈ I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above problems are polynomial-time solvable (see, e.g., [23]) in their unbudgeted version (k = 0), but become NP-hard [1,6] even for a single budget constraint (k = 1). For the case of one budget (k = 1), PTASs are known for spanning tree [35] (see also [21]), 1 The assumption that k is a constant is crucial in this paper, since many of the presented algorithms will have a running time that is exponential in k, but polynomial for constant k. 2 We recall that E is a finite ground set and I ⊆ 2 E is a nonempty family of subsets of E (independent sets) which have to satisfy the following two conditions: (i) I ∈ I, J ⊆ I ⇒ J ∈ I and (ii) I, J ∈ I, |I| > |J| ⇒ ∃z ∈ I \ J : J ∪ {z} ∈ I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the problems above are polynomial-time solvable (see, e.g., [24]) in their unbudgeted version (k = 0), but become NP-hard [1,3,7] even for a single budget constraint (k = 1). For the case of one budget (k = 1), polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASs) are known for spanning tree [21] (see also [11]), shortest path [25] (see also [10,14]), and matching [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the minimization problem can trivially be transformed into a maximization variant, we ignore this difference in the following. Aggarwal et al [3] were the first describing this problem and called it MST problem subject to a side constraint. They proved its N Phardness and proposed a branch-and-bound approach for solving it.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%