2015
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.115.002867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimalist Approach to Evaluating Patients for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 When monitored anesthetic care or CS is used, TTE is typically used, although some sites report successful intraprocedural imaging using TEE and monitored anesthetic care. 54 Two recent observational studies support the safety of the minimalist anesthetic approach compared with GA. First, the European Society of Cardiologist's Transcatheter Valve Treatment Registry found that survival at 1 year, compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar between groups (log-rank: P=0.1505), although in the highest tertile logEuroSCORE group, GA patients had higher mortality. Interestingly, GA patients had a higher immediate procedural success rate and a lower rate of periprocedural complications, and CS patients had a strong trend to higher combined (myocardial infarction, major stroke, and in-hospital death rates) adverse event rate (7.0% CS versus 5.3% GA; P=0.053).…”
Section: Intraprocedural Imaging For Specific Valvular Interventions mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…53 When monitored anesthetic care or CS is used, TTE is typically used, although some sites report successful intraprocedural imaging using TEE and monitored anesthetic care. 54 Two recent observational studies support the safety of the minimalist anesthetic approach compared with GA. First, the European Society of Cardiologist's Transcatheter Valve Treatment Registry found that survival at 1 year, compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar between groups (log-rank: P=0.1505), although in the highest tertile logEuroSCORE group, GA patients had higher mortality. Interestingly, GA patients had a higher immediate procedural success rate and a lower rate of periprocedural complications, and CS patients had a strong trend to higher combined (myocardial infarction, major stroke, and in-hospital death rates) adverse event rate (7.0% CS versus 5.3% GA; P=0.053).…”
Section: Intraprocedural Imaging For Specific Valvular Interventions mentioning
confidence: 95%