2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Brain Port Approach for Accessing Deep-Seated Lesions Using Simple Syringe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iatrogenic brain retraction injuries occur in around 10% of major procedures of cranial tumors and 5% of intracerebral aneurysms as previously reported (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). These injuries may range from mild edema to severe edema even contributing to mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Iatrogenic brain retraction injuries occur in around 10% of major procedures of cranial tumors and 5% of intracerebral aneurysms as previously reported (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). These injuries may range from mild edema to severe edema even contributing to mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…None of them showed significant rates of intraoperative or postoperative complications. 22 23 24 25 26 We believe that our technique shares the same advantages even with important differences, such as previous dilatation with the Foley probe, which provides security in preventing brain damage and probably less damage to the white matter fibers. Futhermore, our technique did not need an external fixator to secure the retractor, since the flanges of the syringe served as its own retainer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…9 There are reports in the literature of tubular retraction methods with syringes associated with microsurgical techniques such as endoscopy or microscopy, which are used in the resection of lesions such as intracerebral hematomas, glioblastomas, and gliosarcomas, among others (►Table 1). Almubarak et al 22 described a technique similar to ours, in which a retraction system with a syringe and a Foley probe was used, which has been shown to be useful in preventing trauma to the brain parenchyma in the path to the injury. Other articles [23][24][25] have also shown syringe techniques associated with trocar designed from medical-grade plastic dilators or gloves as an alternative.…”
Section: No Complications or Postoperative Morbidity Observedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some surgeons still use open craniotomy through the transcortical-transventricular approach, others favor interhemispheric-transcallosal, endoscopic, or stereotactic aspiration, while many advocate minimally invasive brain ports or brain syringes. [ 2 , 13 , 14 ] With the introduction of CT and MRI, the safety profile of CC removal has significantly improved in recent decades, and the use of less invasive approaches has increased. These and other advanced technologies have also facilitated decision-making and have improved our understanding of the natural history of CC, including the risks of death and neurological deterioration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%