Aim: With the development of technology and surgical techniques, minimally invasive surgical approaches are being preferred by surgeons in cardiac surgery. Smaller incisions with these approaches provide a faster recovery and higher life quality in the early post-operative period. In this study, we report our experience with minimally invasive approaches in cardiac surgery. Primary end-point of the study was technical success and secondary was early discharge from the hospital. Material and Method: Eighteen patients that underwent open-heart surgery with minimally invasive approaches between 2016 and 2017 at Hisar Intercontinental Hospital were enrolled in the study. The median age was 53 (18-84) years, four were female (22%). J-mini-sternotomy was performed in four patients requiring aortic valve replacement, and in six patients CABG X1 with beating-heart. T-sternotomy in two CABG X2 procedures), in four patients requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and in two patients requiring ASD repair with right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy incision (4 MVR, 2 ASD). Results: The mean cross-clamp time was 57.75 min (approximately two times longer than conventional methods). All patients were extubated in ICU 4-6 h after the surgery. Early mortality (within 30 days after the surgery) was observed in only one patient due to non-cardiac reasons. No complications were observed from the surgical wound. Discussion: Minimally invasive surgery is gaining popularity, and patients prefer these procedures more often. Exposure of surgical field, performing better cases from small incisions are associated with the surgeon's learning curve. With the increasing experience, minimally invasive cardiac surgery can be considered for selected patients and especially for patients with high risk of wound complications who are obese, have diabetes, osteoporosis or small skin incision preferred for patients with aesthetic anxiety.