2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-009-0441-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for atrial fibrillation complicated by coronary artery disease: combination of video-assisted pulmonary vein isolation and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

Abstract: Here we report a minimally invasive cardiac surgery procedure without sternotomy combining video-assisted bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as treatment for atrial fibrillation complicated by coronary artery disease. The patient's chest was accessed through a left anterolateral thoracotomy over the fourth intercostal space, and the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was harvested under direct vision. The left pulmonary veins were isolated electrically by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Totsugawa et al [ 22 ] described in a case report a technique combining surgical AF ablation and LAD revascularization. There are 2 important differences between their technique and the technique described in the current manuscript: surgical AF ablation was performed via unilateral thoracoscopy compared to bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy and LIMA harvesting was robot-assisted compared to under direct vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Totsugawa et al [ 22 ] described in a case report a technique combining surgical AF ablation and LAD revascularization. There are 2 important differences between their technique and the technique described in the current manuscript: surgical AF ablation was performed via unilateral thoracoscopy compared to bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy and LIMA harvesting was robot-assisted compared to under direct vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%