2010
DOI: 10.1308/003588410x12628812458815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive excision of gynaecomastia – a novel and effective surgical technique

Abstract: INTRODUCTION More aesthetically acceptable treatment options have been sought to minimise the morbidity associated with open surgery for gynaecomastia. This study investigated the use of a vacuum-assisted biopsy device (VABD) and liposuction to provide minimally invasive approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with idiopathic benign gynaecomastia referred to the Breast Care Unit of Castle Hill Hospital between June 2002 and April 2007 and requesting surgical intervention underwent VABD excision and l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite progressive improvement, surgery is still associated with possible postoperative complications (hematomas, seromas), and often the final result is esthetically unsatisfactory because of the presence of asymmetry, scars or excessive residual skin [3]. In order to overcome the limits of a ‘classic’ approach, it has been tried to render surgical techniques less invasive; in addition to the ‘classic’ mastectomy, nowadays alternative techniques are available such as liposuction combined with subcutaneous mastectomy [16] and minimally invasive excision [17]. The former procedure is characterized by lower invasiveness and esthetically much appreciated results, but it does not completely eliminate the possible complications (such as altered peri-areolar sensation or keloid formation) of an open procedure, and it may also be slightly effective when fat excess has been definitely substituted by fibrosis.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite progressive improvement, surgery is still associated with possible postoperative complications (hematomas, seromas), and often the final result is esthetically unsatisfactory because of the presence of asymmetry, scars or excessive residual skin [3]. In order to overcome the limits of a ‘classic’ approach, it has been tried to render surgical techniques less invasive; in addition to the ‘classic’ mastectomy, nowadays alternative techniques are available such as liposuction combined with subcutaneous mastectomy [16] and minimally invasive excision [17]. The former procedure is characterized by lower invasiveness and esthetically much appreciated results, but it does not completely eliminate the possible complications (such as altered peri-areolar sensation or keloid formation) of an open procedure, and it may also be slightly effective when fat excess has been definitely substituted by fibrosis.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Recently, VABD has been used for removal of benign breast lesions because the procedure is simple and less time-consuming. 12,13 It is also suitable for outpatient treatment under local anesthesia and causes minimal scarring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56,59 Liposuction in combination with vacuum-assisted biopsy device (mammotome) has been also reported and may provide the same outcome. 60 As for female macromastia and gigantomastia frequently associated with significant symptoms such as neck and back pain, grooving of the shoulders from bras straps, and inframammary fold irritation and dermatitis, the standard treatment is surgical breast reduction. 7 Liposuction combined with traditional resection mammaplasty has been exploited for many years, allowing volume reduction before excision in addition to refining the results after excision as popularized by Lejour.…”
Section: Gynecomastia Macromastia and Gigantomastiamentioning
confidence: 99%