2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-018-0575-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of calcaneum: a short-term prospective study on functional and radiological outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Percutaneous screw fixation with limited sinus tarsi incision had shown good functional and radiological outcome with minimal complications and can be undertaken without delay. 15 Reduction with Steinman pin was used in 9 patients. Though 3 patients had evidence of infection and 2 had delayed wound healing, these were less than skin complications reported with ORIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Percutaneous screw fixation with limited sinus tarsi incision had shown good functional and radiological outcome with minimal complications and can be undertaken without delay. 15 Reduction with Steinman pin was used in 9 patients. Though 3 patients had evidence of infection and 2 had delayed wound healing, these were less than skin complications reported with ORIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A publicação de técnicas minimamente invasivas para reconstrução desta fratura (15,(24)(25)(26) , levou-nos a pensar na mudança de protocolo para o tratamento conservador. A ideia seria abordar este grupo de pacientes candidatos ao tratamento conservador na fase aguda, empregando técnicas percutâneas ou utilizando pequenas incisões, no intuito principalmente de devolver o formato anatômico ao calcâneo e reduzir o melhor possível a articulação talocalcânea, diminuindo o tamanho da cirurgia para correção…”
Section: Aofasunclassified
“…In this procedure, the surgeon often performs closed reduction of the fracture or open reduction with a small incision, in conjunction with percutaneous fixation [3]. This has many advantages compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) [4,5] including fewer incision-related complications [6], shorter duration of limb swelling [7], shorter recovery time [8], and lower rate of fixation failure [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%