2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)31012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Ten Years Later, Why Are We Still Falling Short?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proponents have expanded the indications for vaginal surgery and the once generally accepted contraindications to the vaginal approach no longer seem to be obstacles, such as nulliparity or no previous vaginal delivery, or a previous cesarean delivery . The unbalanced ratio of the abdominal/vaginal hysterectomy routes has not changed in the last 10 years with the predominant percentage still being the abdominal approach for up to 70% of women . Factors responsible for this choice include surgeons' expertise, patients' preferences , insufficient training and the use of limited or obsolete guidelines .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents have expanded the indications for vaginal surgery and the once generally accepted contraindications to the vaginal approach no longer seem to be obstacles, such as nulliparity or no previous vaginal delivery, or a previous cesarean delivery . The unbalanced ratio of the abdominal/vaginal hysterectomy routes has not changed in the last 10 years with the predominant percentage still being the abdominal approach for up to 70% of women . Factors responsible for this choice include surgeons' expertise, patients' preferences , insufficient training and the use of limited or obsolete guidelines .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%