Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Object</jats:title> <jats:p>Adjacent-segment degeneration and stenosis are common in patients who have undergone previous lumbar fusion. Treatment typically involves a revision posterior approach, which requires management of postoperative scar tissue and previously implanted instrumentation. A minimally invasive lateral approach allows the surgeon to potentially reduce the risk of these hazards. The technique relies on indirect decompression to treat central and foraminal stenosis and placement of a graft with a large surface area to promote robust fusion and stability in concert with the surrounding tensioned ligaments. The goal in this study was to determine if lateral interbody fusion without supplemental pedicle screws is effective in treating adjacent-segment disease.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>For a 30-month study period at two institutions, the authors obtained all cases of lumbar fusion with new back and leg pain due to adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis failing conservative measures. All patients had undergone minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from the side of greater leg pain without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Patients were excluded from the study if they had undergone surgery for a nondegenerative etiology such as infection or trauma. They were also excluded if the intervention involved supplemental posterior instrumented fusion with transpedicular screws. Postoperative metrics included numeric pain scale (NPS) scores for leg and back pain. All patients underwent dynamic radiographs and CT scanning to assess stability and fusion after surgery.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>During the 30-month study period, 21 patients (43% female) were successfully treated using minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion without the need for subsequent posterior transpedicular fixation. The mean patient age was 61 years (range 37–87 years). Four patients had two adjacent levels fused, while the remainder had single-level surgery. All patients underwent surgery without conversion to a traditional open technique, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2 was used in the interbody space in all cases. The mean follow-up was 23.6 months. The mean operative time was 86 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 93 ml. There were no major intraoperative complications, but one patient underwent subsequent direct decompression in a delayed fashion. The leg pain NPS score improved from a mean of 6.3 to 1.9 (p &lt; 0.01), and the back pain NPS score improved from a mean of 7.5 to 2.9 (p &lt; 0.01). Intervertebral settling averaged 1.7 mm. All patients had bridging bone on CT scanning at the last follow-up, indicating solid bony fusion.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis can be treated with a number of different operative techniques. Lateral interbody fusion provides an attractive alternative with reduced blood loss and complications, as there is no need to re-explore a previous laminectomy site. In this limited series a minimally invasive lateral approach provided high fusion rates when performed with osteobiological adjuvants.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Hydrogen peroxide induces programmed necrosis in rat nucleus pulposus cells through the RIP1/RIP3‐PARP‐AIF pathway

“…Currently, IVD degeneration (IVDD) is generally considered to be the main cause of LBP . However, the pathogenesis of IVDD has not been clearly elucidated and currently no available therapeutic regimens can solve the problem fundamentally . As a result, further clarification of the underlying mechanisms and exploration of new strategies to prevent and treat IVDD are of great significance.…”

Therapeutic effect of MIPPSO in the thoracolumbar vertebra fracture

“…The pathological area in which the nail is put in does not contain the main dominant nerve. In addition, this way of treatment does not require a long time separation and traction of muscle fibers, avoiding damage to muscle function and muscle fibers as well as promoting post-operative recovery of patients (5). Lowery and Kulkarni (6) conducted percutaneous minimally invasive internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.…”

Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note

“…Among them, LLIF has been suggested as one of the viable alternatives for these pathologies, providing reduced blood loss and complications, as well as high fusion rates 14,15) . Standard posterior revision surgery would involve a laminectomy with potential concomitant fusion and extension of instrumentation, which can include some major complications, including a higher rate of durotomy followed by cerebrospinal fluid leakage and extensive injury of posterior spinal elements, which may lead to massive bleeding and disruption of the rostral facet joint capsules [15][16][17] . The LLIF procedure can prevent these complications via an anterior approach by achieving indirect neural decompression through ligamentotaxis.…”