2022
DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.focvid2210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for lumbar corpectomy and fusion with posterior instrumentation

Abstract: In this video, the authors highlight the operative treatment of a 55-year-old man with chronic osteomyelitis discitis. The operation entailed a minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for L3 and L4 corpectomies, L2–5 interbody fusion, and L2–5 minimally invasive posterior instrumentation. The operation proceeded in two stages, beginning in the lateral position with corpectomy of the L3 and L4 vertebral bodies and placement of a corpectomy cage. After closure of this access wound, the pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15] One increasingly attractive option for these patients is the use of anterior column realignment (ACR) with a minimally invasive approach. This approach has lower associated trauma to the paraspinal musculature 16 and attempts to physiologically reverse the deformity through selective anterior column elongation. Although purely minimally invasive approaches may not be feasible for rigid deformities, they can be preferrable in patients with flexible or smaller deformities, especially in light of advances in preoperative planning software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] One increasingly attractive option for these patients is the use of anterior column realignment (ACR) with a minimally invasive approach. This approach has lower associated trauma to the paraspinal musculature 16 and attempts to physiologically reverse the deformity through selective anterior column elongation. Although purely minimally invasive approaches may not be feasible for rigid deformities, they can be preferrable in patients with flexible or smaller deformities, especially in light of advances in preoperative planning software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%