Objective: To compare the outcomes of MitraClip and surgical mitral repair in low-intermediate risk elderly patients affected by degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).Methods: We retrospectively selected patients aged !75 years, with Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk Of Mortality (STS-PROM) <8%, submitted to MitraClip (n ¼ 100) or isolated surgical repair (n ¼ 206) for DMR at 2 centers between January 2005 and May 2017. To adjust for baseline imbalances, we used a propensity score model for average treatment effect on survival.Results: After weighting, MitraClip showed fewer postoperative complications (P <.05) but increased residual mitral regurgitation (MR) !2 (27.0% vs 2.8%, P <.001) compared with surgery. One-year survival was greater after MitraClip compared with surgery (97.6% vs 95.3%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.37, P ¼ .001), whereas 5-year survival was lower (34.5% vs 82.