Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period

Matsuo, Koji; Matsuzaki, Shinya; Mandelbaum, Rachel S.; Chang, Erica J.; Klar, Maximilian; Matsushima, Kazuhide; Grubbs, Brendan H.; Roman, Lynda D.; Wright, Jason D.

doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.009

Cited by 19 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is a secondary analysis of a recently organized population-based database for benign hysterectomy utilizing the United States National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), which is a publicly available and deidentified data platform distributed as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [27,28]. The details of NIS program were described in prior studies [28,29]. The University of Southern California Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt due to the use of publicly available, deidentified data.…”

Section: Data Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Covariates section and grouping as well as measured outcomes were consistent with our prior studies [28][29][30], and a complete list of the ICD-9 codes was described previously [28][29][30]. Data variables abstracted from the NIS program included: patient demographics, hospital characteristics, gynecologic disease type, surgical procedure type, and perioperative outcomes.…”

Section: Clinical Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Risk of Upper-body Adverse Events in Robot-assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Matsuo

Mandelbaum

Nusbaum

et al. 2021

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Section: Data Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Clinical Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk of Upper-body Adverse Events in Robot-assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Matsuo

Mandelbaum

Nusbaum

et al. 2021

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 The cost was even higher when the minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was coverted to open ($17 036). Because robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy represents the majority of minimally invasive radical hysterectomies, 5 higher treatment cost related to this treatment approach may result in a financial burden as a whole.…”

Section: Gynecological Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial viewpoint of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: another disadvantage?

Matsuo

Matsuzaki

Mandelbaum

et al. 2020

Int J Gynecol Cancer

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In MIS, hospital surgical volume may positively correlate to improved perioperative and oncologic outcomes because (i) MIS is more technically demanding than open surgery, (ii) robotic-assisted MIS for malignant disease has been recently introduced [ 7 ], and (iii) MIS is less frequently performed in complex surgeries for malignant diseases [ 8 ]. However, the volume–outcome association for perioperative and oncologic outcomes in MIS for malignancies is understudied; thus, little is known regarding the impact of hospital surgical volume on these cases.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy

Matsuzaki

Klar

Chang

et al. 2021

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the effect of hospital surgical volume on oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynecologic malignancies. The objectives were to assess survival outcomes related to hospital surgical volume and to evaluate perioperative outcomes and examine non-gynecologic malignancies. Literature available from the PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed. All surgical procedures including gynecologic surgery with hospital surgical volume information were eligible for analysis. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, and nine gastro-intestinal studies, seven genitourinary studies, four gynecological studies, two hepatobiliary studies, and one thoracic study were reviewed. Of those, 11 showed a positive volume–outcome association for perioperative outcomes. A study on MIS for ovarian cancer reported lower surgical morbidity in high-volume centers. Two studies were on endometrial cancer, of which one showed lower treatment costs in high-volume centers and the other showed no association with perioperative morbidity. Another study examined robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and found no volume–outcome association for surgical morbidity. There were no gynecologic studies examining the association between hospital surgical volume and oncologic outcomes in MIS. The volume–outcome association for oncologic outcome in gynecologic MIS is understudied. This lack of evidence calls for further studies to address this knowledge gap.

show abstract

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period

Cited by 19 publications

References 17 publications

Risk of Upper-body Adverse Events in Robot-assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Risk of Upper-body Adverse Events in Robot-assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Financial viewpoint of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: another disadvantage?

Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About